Поиск
Закладки
Озвучить текст Озвучить книгу
Изменить режим чтения
Изменить размер шрифта
Оглавление
Для озвучивания и цитирования книги перейдите в режим постраничного просмотра.
Сахарный диабет 1 типа у детей

Список литературы

  1. Дедов И.И., Кураева Т.Л., Петеркова В.А. Сахарный диабет у детей и подростков. Москва: ГЭОТАР-Медиа, 2013. 271 p.
  2. Insel R.A. et al. Staging Presymptomatic Type 1 Diabetes: A Scientific Statement of JDRF, the Endocrine Society, and the American Diabetes Association // Diabetes Care. 2015. Vol. 38, № 10. P. 1964–1974.
  3. Ziegler A.G. et al. Seroconversion to Multiple Islet Autoantibodies and Risk of Progression to Diabetes in Children // JAMA. 2013. Vol. 309, № 23. P. 2473.
  4. International Diabetes Federation. IDF Diabetes Atlas, 10th edn. Brussels, Belgium: International Diabetes Federation, 2021.
  5. Mayer-Davis E.J. et al. ISPAD Clinical Practice Consensus Guidelines 2018: Definition, epidemiology, and classification of diabetes in children and adolescents // Pediatr. Diabetes. 2018. Vol. 19. P. 7–19.
  6. Александрова Г.А. et al. Общая заболеваемость детского населения России (0 – 14 лет) в 2019 году. Статистические материалы. Часть VI. Москва: Департамент мониторинга, анализа и стратегического развития здравоохранения Минздрава России, ФГБУ «ЦНИИОИЗ» Минздрава России, 2020.
  7. Александрова Г.А. et al. Заболеваемость детского населения России (0 – 14 лет) в 2019 году с диагнозом, установленным впервые в жизни. Статистические материалы. Часть V. Москва: Департамент мониторинга, анализа и стратегического развития здравоохранения Минздрава России, ФГБУ «ЦНИИОИЗ» Минздрава России, 2020.
  8. Александрова Г.А. et al. Заболеваемость детского населения России (15 – 17 лет) в 2019 году с диагнозом, установленным впервые в жизни. Статистические материалы. Часть IX. Москва: Департамент мониторинга, анализа и стратегического развития здравоохранения Минздрава России, ФГБУ «ЦНИИОИЗ» Минздрава России, 2020.
  9. Александрова Г.А. et al. Общая заболеваемость детского населения России (15 – 17 лет) в 2019 году. Статистические материалы. Часть Х. Москва: Департамент мониторинга, анализа и стратегического развития здравоохранения Минздрава России, ФГБУ «ЦНИИОИЗ» Минздрава России, 2020.
  10. Дедов И.И., Шестакова М.В., Викулова О.К. Эпидемиология сахарного диабета в Российской Федерации: клинико-статистический анализ по данным Федерального регистра сахарного диабета. 2017. Vol. 1, № 20. P. 13–41.
  11. Дедов И.И. et al. Сахарный диабет у детей и подростков по данным Федерального регистра Российской Федерации: динамика основных эпидемиологических характеристик за 2013-2016 гг. // Сахарный Диабет. 2017. Vol. 20, № 6. P. 392–402.

  1. World Health Organization. Classification of diabetes mellitus. 2019.
  2. American Diabetes Association. 2. Classification and Diagnosis of Diabetes: Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes—2021 // Diabetes Care. 2021. Vol. 44, № Supplement 1. P. S15–S33.
  3. World Health Organization, International Diabetes Federation. Definition and diagnosis of diabetes mellitus and intermediate hyperglycaemia: report of a WHO/IDF consultation. 2006.
  4. American Diabetes Association. 2. Classification and Diagnosis of Diabetes: Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes—2018 // Diabetes Care. 2018. Vol. 41, № Supplement 1. P. S13–S27.
  5. Watkins R.A. et al. Established and emerging biomarkers for the prediction of type 1 diabetes: a systematic review // Transl. Res. J. Lab. Clin. Med. 2014. Vol. 164, № 2. P. 110–121.
  6. Dabelea D. et al. Etiological Approach to Characterization of Diabetes Type: The SEARCH for Diabetes in Youth Study // Diabetes Care. 2011. Vol. 34, № 7. P. 1628–1633.
  7. Zeitler P. et al. ISPAD Clinical Practice Consensus Guidelines 2018: Type 2 diabetes mellitus in youth // Pediatr. Diabetes. 2018. Vol. 19. P. 28–46.
  8. Ziegler R. et al. Frequency of SMBG correlates with HbA1c and acute complications in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes // Pediatr. Diabetes. 2011. Vol. 12, № 1. P. 11–17.
  9. DiMeglio L.A. et al. ISPAD Clinical Practice Consensus Guidelines 2018: Glycemic control targets and glucose monitoring for children, adolescents, and young adults with diabetes // Pediatr. Diabetes. 2018. Vol. 19. P. 105–114.
  10. Battelino T. et al. Clinical Targets for Continuous Glucose Monitoring Data Interpretation: Recommendations From the International Consensus on Time in Range // Diabetes Care. 2019. Vol. 42, № 8. P. 1593–1603.
  11. Writing Group for the DCCT/EDIC Research Group et al. Association between 7 years of intensive treatment of type 1 diabetes and long-term mortality // JAMA. 2015. Vol. 313, № 1. P. 45–53.
  12. Writing Team for the DCCT/EDIC Research Group et al. Effects of Prior Intensive Insulin Therapy and Risk Factors on Patient-Reported Visual Function Outcomes in the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial/Epidemiology of Diabetes Interventions and Complications (DCCT/EDIC) Cohort // JAMA Ophthalmol. 2016. Vol. 134, № 2. P. 137–145.
  13. Karges B. et al. Hemoglobin A1c Levels and risk of severe hypoglycemia in children and young adults with type 1 diabetes from Germany and Austria: a trend analysis in a cohort of 37,539 patients between 1995 and 2012 // PLoS Med. 2014. Vol. 11, № 10. P. e1001742.
  14. Beck R.W. et al. Validation of Time in Range as an Outcome Measure for Diabetes Clinical Trials // Diabetes Care. 2019. Vol. 42, № 3. P. 400–405.
  15. Ranjan A.G. et al. Improved Time in Range Over 1 Year Is Associated With Reduced Albuminuria in Individuals With Sensor-Augmented Insulin Pump–Treated Type 1 Diabetes // Diabetes Care. 2020. Vol. 43, № 11. P. 2882–2885.
  16. Fritsche A. et al. Avoidance of hypoglycemia restores hypoglycemia awareness by increasing beta- adrenergic sensitivity in type 1 diabetes // Ann. Intern. Med. 2001. Vol. 134, № 9 Pt 1. P. 729–736.
  17. Liu M. et al. A randomised, open-labelstudy of insulin glargine or neutral protamine Hagedorn insulin in Chinese paediatric patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus // BMC Endocr. Disord. 2016. Vol. 16, № 1. P. 67.
  18. Schober E. et al. Comparative trial between insulin glargine and NPH insulin in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes mellitus // J. Pediatr. Endocrinol. Metab. JPEM. 2002. Vol. 15, № 4. P. 369–376.
  19. Danne T. et al. Pharmacokinetics, prandial glucose control, and safety of insulin glulisine in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes // Diabetes Care. 2005. Vol. 28, № 9. P. 2100–2105.
  20. Philotheou A. et al. Comparable Efficacy and Safety of Insulin Glulisine and Insulin Lispro When Given as Part of a Basal–Bolus Insulin Regimen in a 26-Week Trial in Pediatric Patients with Type 1 Diabetes // Diabetes Technol. Ther. 2011. Vol. 13, № 3. P. 327–334.
  21. Holcombe J.H. et al. Comparison of insulin lispro with regular human insulin for the treatment of type 1 diabetes in adolescents // Clin. Ther. 2002. Vol. 24, № 4. P. 629–638.
  22. Tupola S. et al. Post-prandial insulin lispro vs. human regular insulin in prepubertal children with Type 1 diabetes mellitus // Diabet. Med. J. Br. Diabet. Assoc. 2001. Vol. 18, № 8. P. 654–658.
  23. Rutledge K.S. et al. Effectiveness of Postprandial Humalog in Toddlers With Diabetes // PEDIATRICS. 1997. Vol. 100, № 6. P. 968–972.
  24. Deeb L.C. et al. Insulin Lispro Lowers Postprandial Glucose in Prepubertal Children With Diabetes // PEDIATRICS. 2001. Vol. 108, № 5. P. 1175–1179.
  25. Battelino T. et al. Efficacy and safety of a fixed combination of insulin degludec/insulin aspart in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes: A randomized trial // Pediatr. Diabetes. 2018. Vol. 19, № 7. P. 1263–1270.
  26. Predieri B. et al. Switching From Glargine to Degludec: The Effect on Metabolic Control and Safety During 1-Year of Real Clinical Practice in Children and Adolescents With Type 1 Diabetes // Front. Endocrinol. 2018. Vol. 9. P. 462.
  27. Thalange N. et al. The rate of hyperglycemia and ketosis with insulin degludec‐based treatment compared with insulin detemir in pediatric patients with type 1 diabetes: An analysis of data from two randomized trials // Pediatr. Diabetes. 2019. Vol. 20, № 3. P. 314–320.
  28. Thalange N. et al. Insulin degludec in combination with bolus insulin aspart is safe and effective in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes: IDeg effective and safe in pediatric T1D // Pediatr. Diabetes. 2015. Vol. 16, № 3. P. 164–176.
  29. Danne T. et al. Insulin detemir is characterized by a consistent pharmacokinetic profile across age- groups in children, adolescents, and adults with type 1 diabetes // Diabetes Care. 2003. Vol. 26, № 11. P. 3087–3092.
  30. Robertson K.J. et al. Insulin detemir compared with NPH insulin in children and adolescents with Type 1 diabetes // Diabet. Med. J. Br. Diabet. Assoc. 2007. Vol. 24, № 1. P. 27–34.
  31. Fath M. et al. Faster-acting insulin aspart provides faster onset and greater early exposure vs insulin aspart in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes mellitus: FATH et al . // Pediatr. Diabetes. 2017. Vol. 18, № 8. P. 903–910.
  32. Bode B.W. et al. Efficacy and Safety of Fast-Acting Insulin Aspart Compared With Insulin Aspart, Both in Combination With Insulin Degludec, in Children and Adolescents With Type 1 Diabetes: The onset 7 Trial // Diabetes Care. 2019. Vol. 42, № 7. P. 1255–1262.
  33. Danne T. et al. Efficacy and Safety of Insulin Glargine 300 Units/mL (Gla-300) Versus Insulin Glargine 100 Units/mL (Gla-100) in Children and Adolescents (6-17 years) With Type 1 Diabetes: Results of the EDITION JUNIOR Randomized Controlled Trial // Diabetes Care. 2020. Vol. 43, № 7. P. 1512–1519.
  34. Дедов И.И. et al. Проект рекомендаций Российской ассоциации эндокринологов по применению биосимиляров инсулина. 2021. Vol. 24, № 1. P. 76–79.
  35. Danne T. et al. ISPAD Clinical Practice Consensus Guidelines 2018: Insulin treatment in children and adolescents with diabetes // Pediatr. Diabetes. 2018. Vol. 19. P. 115–135.
  36. Effect of intensive diabetes treatment on the development and progression of long-term complications in adolescents with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus: Diabetes Control and Complications Trial. Diabetes Control and Complications Trial Research Group // J. Pediatr. 1994. Vol. 125, № 2. P. 177–188.
  37. Musen G. et al. Impact of diabetes and its treatment on cognitive function among adolescents who participated in the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial // Diabetes Care. 2008. Vol. 31, № 10. P. 1933–1938.
  38. White N.H. et al. Beneficial effects of intensive therapy of diabetes during adolescence: outcomes after the conclusion of the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial (DCCT) // J. Pediatr. 2001. Vol. 139, № 6. P. 804–812.
  39. Pop-Busui R. et al. Effects of Prior Intensive Insulin Therapy on Cardiac Autonomic Nervous System Function in Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus: The Diabetes Control and Complications Trial/Epidemiology of Diabetes Interventions and Complications Study (DCCT/EDIC) // Circulation. 2009. Vol. 119, № 22. P. 2886–2893.
  40. Nørgaard K. et al. Efficacy and Safety of Rapid-Acting Insulin Analogs in Special Populations with Type 1 Diabetes or Gestational Diabetes: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis // Diabetes Ther. 2018. Vol. 9, № 3. P. 891–917.
  41. Chase H.P. et al. Reduced hypoglycemic episodes and improved glycemic control in children with type 1 diabetes using insulin glargine and neutral protamine Hagedorn insulin // J. Pediatr. 2003. Vol. 143, № 6. P. 737–740.
  42. Frid A.H. et al. New Insulin Delivery Recommendations // Mayo Clin. Proc. 2016. Vol. 91, № 9. P. 1231–1255.
  43. Birkebaek N.H. et al. A 4-mm Needle Reduces the Risk of Intramuscular Injections Without Increasing Backflow to Skin Surface in Lean Diabetic Children and Adults // Diabetes Care. 2008. Vol. 31, № 9. P. e65.
  44. Майоров А.Ю. et al. Техника инъекций и инфузии при лечении сахарного диабета. Методическое руководство. Москва: ООО «АРТИНФО», 2018. 64 p.
  45. Birkebaek N.H. et al. A 4-mm needle reduces the risk of intramuscular injections without increasing backflow to skin surface in lean diabetic children and adults // Diabetes Care. 2008. Vol. 31, № 9. P. e65.
  46. Hofman P.L. et al. Defining the ideal injection techniques when using 5-mm needles in children and adults // Diabetes Care. 2010. Vol. 33, № 9. P. 1940–1944.
  47. Frid A.H. et al. New Insulin Delivery Recommendations // Mayo Clin. Proc. 2016. Vol. 91, № 9. P. 1231–1255.
  48. Lo Presti D., Ingegnosi C., Strauss K. Skin and subcutaneous thickness at injecting sites in children with diabetes: ultrasound findings and recommendations for giving injection // Pediatr. Diabetes. 2012. Vol. 13, № 7. P. 525–533.
  49. Zabaleta-del-Olmo E. et al. Safety of the reuse of needles for subcutaneous insulin injection: A systematic review and meta-analysis // Int. J. Nurs. Stud. 2016. Vol. 60. P. 121–132.
  50. Pańkowska E. et al. Continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion vs. multiple daily injections in children with type 1 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized control trials // Pediatr. Diabetes. 2009. Vol. 10, № 1. P. 52–58.
  51. Benkhadra K. et al. Continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion versus multiple daily injections in individuals with type 1 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis // Endocrine. 2017. Vol. 55, № 1. P. 77–84.
  52. Pickup J.C., Sutton A.J. Severe hypoglycaemia and glycaemic control in Type 1 diabetes: meta- analysis of multiple daily insulin injections compared with continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion // Diabet. Med. J. Br. Diabet. Assoc. 2008. Vol. 25, № 7. P. 765–774.
  53. Vallejo-Mora M.D.R. et al. The Calculating Boluses on Multiple Daily Injections (CBMDI) study: A randomized controlled trial on the effect on metabolic control of adding a bolus calculator to multiple daily injections in people with type 1 diabetes // J. Diabetes. 2017. Vol. 9, № 1. P. 24–33.
  54. Vallejo Mora M.D.R. et al. Bolus Calculator Reduces Hypoglycemia in the Short Term and Fear of Hypoglycemia in the Long Term in Subjects with Type 1 Diabetes (CBMDI Study) // Diabetes Technol. Ther. 2017. Vol. 19, № 7. P. 402–409.
  55. Ziegler R. et al. Use of an insulin bolus advisor improves glycemic control in multiple daily insulin injection (MDI) therapy patients with suboptimal glycemic control: first results from the ABACUS trial // Diabetes Care. 2013. Vol. 36, № 11. P. 3613–3619.
  56. Schmidt S. et al. Use of an automated bolus calculator in MDI-treated type 1 diabetes: the BolusCal Study, a randomized controlled pilot study // Diabetes Care. 2012. Vol. 35, № 5. P. 984–990.
  57. Ramotowska A. et al. The effect of using the insulin pump bolus calculator compared to standard insulin dosage calculations in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus - systematic review // Exp. Clin. Endocrinol. Diabetes Off. J. Ger. Soc. Endocrinol. Ger. Diabetes Assoc. 2013. Vol. 121, № 5. P. 248– 254.
  58. Wong J.C. et al. A Minority of Patients with Type 1 Diabetes Routinely Downloads and Retrospectively Reviews Device Data // Diabetes Technol. Ther. 2015. Vol. 17, № 8. P. 555–562.
  59. Slover R.H. et al. Effectiveness of sensor-augmented pump therapy in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes in the STAR 3 study // Pediatr. Diabetes. 2012. Vol. 13, № 1. P. 6–11.
  60. Ly T.T. et al. Effect of sensor-augmented insulin pump therapy and automated insulin suspension vs standard insulin pump therapy on hypoglycemia in patients with type 1 diabetes: a randomized clinical trial // JAMA. 2013. Vol. 310, № 12. P. 1240–1247.
  61. Abraham M.B. et al. Reduction in Hypoglycemia With the Predictive Low-Glucose Management System: A Long-term Randomized Controlled Trial in Adolescents With Type 1 Diabetes // Diabetes Care. 2018. Vol. 41, № 2. P. 303–310.
  62. Battelino T. et al. Prevention of Hypoglycemia With Predictive Low Glucose Insulin Suspension in Children With Type 1 Diabetes: A Randomized Controlled Trial // Diabetes Care. 2017. Vol. 40, № 6. P. 764–770.
  63. Sherr J.L. et al. ISPAD Clinical Practice Consensus Guidelines 2018: Diabetes technologies // Pediatr. Diabetes. 2018. Vol. 19. P. 302–325.
  64. Phelan H. et al. ISPAD Clinical Practice Consensus Guidelines 2018: Diabetes education in children and adolescents // Pediatr. Diabetes. 2018. Vol. 19. P. 75–83.
  65. Błazik M., Pańkowska E. The effect of bolus and food calculator Diabetics on glucose variability in children with type 1 diabetes treated with insulin pump: the results of RCT // Pediatr. Diabetes. 2012. Vol. 13, № 7. P. 534–539.
  66. Miller K.M. et al. Evidence of a strong association between frequency of self-monitoring of blood glucose and hemoglobin A1c levels in T1D exchange clinic registry participants // Diabetes Care. 2013. Vol. 36, № 7. P. 2009–2014.
  67. Ziegler R. et al. Frequency of SMBG correlates with HbA1c and acute complications in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes // Pediatr. Diabetes. 2011. Vol. 12, № 1. P. 11–17.
  68. Bohn B. et al. 20 Years of Pediatric Benchmarking in Germany and Austria: Age-Dependent Analysis of Longitudinal Follow-Up in 63,967 Children and Adolescents with Type 1 Diabetes // PloS One. 2016. Vol. 11, № 8. P. e0160971.
  69. Battelino T. et al. The use and efficacy of continuous glucose monitoring in type 1 diabetes treated with insulin pump therapy: a randomised controlled trial // Diabetologia. 2012. Vol. 55, № 12. P. 3155–3162.
  70. El-Laboudi A.H. et al. Measures of Glycemic Variability in Type 1 Diabetes and the Effect of Real- Time Continuous Glucose Monitoring // Diabetes Technol. Ther. 2016. Vol. 18, № 12. P. 806–812.
  71. Bergenstal R.M. et al. Sensor-Augmented Pump Therapy for A1C Reduction (STAR 3) Study: Results from the 6-month continuation phase // Diabetes Care. 2011. Vol. 34, № 11. P. 2403–2405.
  72. Piona C. et al. Non-adjunctive flash glucose monitoring system use during summer-camp in children with type 1 diabetes: The free-summer study // Pediatr. Diabetes. 2018. Vol. 19, № 7. P. 1285– 1293.
  73. Campbell F.M. et al. Outcomes of using flash glucose monitoring technology by children and young people with type 1 diabetes in a single arm study // Pediatr. Diabetes. 2018. Vol. 19, № 7. P. 1294–1301.
  74. Hásková A. et al. Real-time CGM Is Superior to Flash Glucose Monitoring for Glucose Control in Type 1 Diabetes: The CORRIDA Randomized Controlled Trial // Diabetes Care. 2020. Vol. 43, № 11. P. 2744–2750.
  75. Laptev D.N. et al. The use of Flash glucose monitoring in children with type 1 diabetes mellitus in real clinical practice // Diabetes Mellit. 2021. Vol. 24, № 6. P. 504–510.
  76. Петеркова В.А. et al. Оценка эффективности амбулаторного наблюдения детей и подростков с сахарным диабетом 1-го типа при регулярном использовании профессионального непрерывного мониторинга уровня глюкозы // Проблемы эндокринологии. 2020. Vol. 66, № 1. P. 14–22.
  77. Pickup J.C., Freeman S.C., Sutton A.J. Glycaemic control in type 1 diabetes during real time continuous glucose monitoring compared with self monitoring of blood glucose: meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials using individual patient data // BMJ. 2011. Vol. 343. P. d3805.
  78. Battelino T. et al. Effect of Continuous Glucose Monitoring on Hypoglycemia in Type 1 Diabetes // Diabetes Care. 2011. Vol. 34, № 4. P. 795–800.
  79. Hirsch I.B. et al. Sensor-augmented insulin pump therapy: results of the first randomized treat-to- target study // Diabetes Technol. Ther. 2008. Vol. 10, № 5. P. 377–383.
  80. Chase H.P. et al. Use of the GlucoWatch biographer in children with type 1 diabetes // Pediatrics. 2003. Vol. 111, № 4 Pt 1. P. 790–794.
  81. Kaufman F.R. et al. A pilot study of the continuous glucose monitoring system: clinical decisions and glycemic control after its use in pediatric type 1 diabetic subjects // Diabetes Care. 2001. Vol. 24, № 12. P. 2030–2034.
  82. Ludvigsson J., Hanas R. Continuous subcutaneous glucose monitoring improved metabolic control in pediatric patients with type 1 diabetes: a controlled crossover study // Pediatrics. 2003. Vol. 111, № 5 Pt 1. P. 933–938.
  83. Boucher S.E. et al. Effect of 6 months’ flash glucose monitoring in adolescents and young adults with type 1 diabetes and suboptimal glycaemic control: managing diabetes in a “flash” randomised controlled trial protocol // BMC Endocr. Disord. 2019. Vol. 19, № 1. P. 50.
  84. Heinemann L. et al. Real-time continuous glucose monitoring in adults with type 1 diabetes and impaired hypoglycaemia awareness or severe hypoglycaemia treated with multiple daily insulin injections (HypoDE): a multicentre, randomised controlled trial // The Lancet. 2018. Vol. 391, № 10128. P. 1367–1377.
  85. van Beers C.A.J. et al. Continuous glucose monitoring for patients with type 1 diabetes and impaired awareness of hypoglycaemia (IN CONTROL): a randomised, open-label, crossover trial // Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2016. Vol. 4, № 11. P. 893–902.
  86. Choudhary P. et al. Real-Time Continuous Glucose Monitoring Significantly Reduces Severe Hypoglycemia in Hypoglycemia-Unaware Patients With Type 1 Diabetes // Diabetes Care. 2013. Vol. 36, № 12. P. 4160–4162.
  87. DAFNE Study Group. Training in flexible, intensive insulin management to enable dietary freedom in people with Type 1 diabetes: dose adjustment for normal eating (DAFNE) randomized controlled trial // Diabet. Med. J. Br. Diabet. Assoc. 2003. Vol. 20 Suppl 3. P. 4–5.
  88. Hampson S.E. et al. Effects of educational and psychosocial interventions for adolescents with diabetes mellitus: a systematic review // Health Technol. Assess. Winch. Engl. 2001. Vol. 5, № 10. P. 1–79.
  89. Smart C.E. et al. ISPAD Clinical Practice Consensus Guidelines 2018: Nutritional management in children and adolescents with diabetes // Pediatr. Diabetes. 2018. Vol. 19. P. 136–154.
  90. Mann J.I. et al. Evidence-based nutritional approaches to the treatment and prevention of diabetes mellitus // Nutr. Metab. Cardiovasc. Dis. NMCD. 2004. Vol. 14, № 6. P. 373–394.
  91. Delahanty L.M. et al. Association of diet with glycated hemoglobin during intensive treatment of type 1 diabetes in the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial // Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2009. Vol. 89, № 2. P. 518–524.
  92. Bell K.J. et al. Impact of fat, protein, and glycemic index on postprandial glucose control in type 1 diabetes: implications for intensive diabetes management in the continuous glucose monitoring era // Diabetes Care. 2015. Vol. 38, № 6. P. 1008–1015.
  93. Nansel T.R., Lipsky L.M., Liu A. Greater diet quality is associated with more optimal glycemic control in a longitudinal study of youth with type 1 diabetes // Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2016. Vol. 104, № 1. P. 81–87.
  94. Paterson M.A. et al. Increasing the protein quantity in a meal results in dose-dependent effects on postprandial glucose levels in individuals with Type 1 diabetes mellitus // Diabet. Med. J. Br. Diabet. Assoc. 2017. Vol. 34, № 6. P. 851–854.
  95. Smart C.E.M. et al. Both Dietary Protein and Fat Increase Postprandial Glucose Excursions in Children With Type 1 Diabetes, and the Effect Is Additive // Diabetes Care. 2013. Vol. 36, № 12. P. 3897–3902.
  96. Pańkowska E., Błazik M., Groele L. Does the Fat-Protein Meal Increase Postprandial Glucose Level in Type 1 Diabetes Patients on Insulin Pump: The Conclusion of a Randomized Study // Diabetes Technol. Ther. 2012. Vol. 14, № 1. P. 16–22.
  97. Cameron F. et al. Lessons from the Hvidoere International Study Group on childhood diabetes: be dogmatic about outcome and flexible in approach: Hvidoere group studies // Pediatr. Diabetes. 2013. Vol. 14, № 7. P. 473–480.
  98. Quirk H. et al. Physical activity interventions in children and young people with Type 1 diabetes mellitus: a systematic review with meta-analysis // Diabet. Med. J. Br. Diabet. Assoc. 2014. Vol. 31, № 10. P. 1163–1173.
  99. MacMillan F. et al. A systematic review of physical activity and sedentary behavior intervention studies in youth with type 1 diabetes: study characteristics, intervention design, and efficacy // Pediatr. Diabetes. 2014. Vol. 15, № 3. P. 175–189.
  100. Nocon M. et al. Association of physical activity with all-cause and cardiovascular mortality: a systematic review and meta-analysis // Eur. J. Cardiovasc. Prev. Rehabil. Off. J. Eur. Soc. Cardiol. Work. Groups Epidemiol. Prev. Card. Rehabil. Exerc. Physiol. 2008. Vol. 15, № 3. P. 239–246.
  101. Riddell M.C., Perkins B.A. Type 1 Diabetes and Vigorous Exercise: Applications of Exercise Physiology to Patient Management // Can. J. Diabetes. 2006. Vol. 30, № 1. P. 63–71.
  102. Adolfsson P. et al. ISPAD Clinical Practice Consensus Guidelines 2018: Exercise in children and adolescents with diabetes // Pediatr. Diabetes. 2018. Vol. 19. P. 205–226.
  103. Young V. et al. Eating problems in adolescents with Type 1 diabetes: a systematic review with meta-analysis // Diabet. Med. J. Br. Diabet. Assoc. 2013. Vol. 30, № 2. P. 189–198.
  104. Kongkaew C. et al. Depression and adherence to treatment in diabetic children and adolescents: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies // Eur. J. Pediatr. 2014. Vol. 173, № 2. P. 203–212.
  105. Шашель В.А., Черняк И.Ю. Комплексное восстановительное лечение детей, больных сахарным диабетом 1-го типа, в санаторно-курортных условиях. 2011. № 4. P. 30–32.
  106. Лагунова et al. State of the adaptive-compensatory mechanisms in children with type 1 diabetes mellitus and its changes after sanatorium-resort treatment // J. New Med. Technol. EJournal. 2014. Vol. 8, № 1. P. 0–0.
  107. Pihoker C. et al. ISPAD Clinical Practice Consensus Guidelines 2018: The delivery of ambulatory diabetes care to children and adolescents with diabetes // Pediatr. Diabetes. 2018. Vol. 19. P. 84–104.
  108. Shah A.C., Badawy S.M. Telemedicine in Pediatrics: Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials // JMIR Pediatr. Parent. 2021. Vol. 4, № 1. P. e22696.
  109. Lee S.W.H., Ooi L., Lai Y.K. Telemedicine for the Management of Glycemic Control and Clinical Outcomes of Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Studies // Front. Pharmacol. 2017. Vol. 8. P. 330.
  110. Faruque L.I. et al. Effect of telemedicine on glycated hemoglobin in diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials // Can. Med. Assoc. J. 2017. Vol. 189, № 9. P. E341–E364.
  111. Cho Y.H. et al. Microvascular complications assessment in adolescents with 2- to 5-yr duration of type 1 diabetes from 1990 to 2006 // Pediatr. Diabetes. 2011. Vol. 12, № 8. P. 682–689.
  112. Donaghue K.C. et al. ISPAD Clinical Practice Consensus Guidelines 2018: Microvascular and macrovascular complications in children and adolescents // Pediatr. Diabetes. 2018. Vol. 19. P. 262– 274.
  113. Chiang J.L. et al. Type 1 Diabetes in Children and Adolescents: A Position Statement by the American Diabetes Association // Diabetes Care. 2018. Vol. 41, № 9. P. 2026–2044.
  114. Sivaprasad S. et al. Clinical efficacy of intravitreal aflibercept versus panretinal photocoagulation for best corrected visual acuity in patients with proliferative diabetic retinopathy at 52 weeks (CLARITY): a multicentre, single-blinded, randomised, controlled, phase 2b, non-inferiority trial // Lancet Lond. Engl. 2017. Vol. 389, № 10085. P. 2193–2203.
  115. Stahl A. et al. Ranibizumab versus laser therapy for the treatment of very low birthweight infants with retinopathy of prematurity (RAINBOW): an open-label randomised controlled trial // Lancet Lond. Engl. 2019. Vol. 394, № 10208. P. 1551–1559.
  116. Дедов И.И., Шестакова М.В. Осложнения сахарного диабета: лечение и профилактика. Москва: МИА, 2017. 743 p.
  117. de Boer I.H., DCCT/EDIC Research Group. Kidney disease and related findings in the diabetes control and complications trial/epidemiology of diabetes interventions and complications study. // Diabetes Care. 2014. Vol. 37, № 1. P. 24–30.
  118. Fox C.S. et al. Associations of kidney disease measures with mortality and end-stage renal disease in individuals with and without diabetes: a meta-analysis. // Lancet. 2012. Vol. 380, № 9854. P. 1662–1673.
  119. National Kidney Foundation. KDIGO 2012 Clinical Practice Guideline for the Evaluation and Management of Chronic Kidney Disease // Kidney Int Suppl. 2013. Vol. 3, № 1. P. 1–150.
  120. Stevens P.E., Levin A., Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes Chronic Kidney Disease Guideline Development Work Group Members. Evaluation and management of chronic kidney disease: synopsis of the kidney disease: improving global outcomes 2012 clinical practice guideline // Ann. Intern. Med. 2013. Vol. 158, № 11. P. 825–830.
  121. Schwartz G.J. et al. New equations to estimate GFR in children with CKD // J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. JASN. 2009. Vol. 20, № 3. P. 629–637.
  122. Schwartz G.J., Work D.F. Measurement and estimation of GFR in children and adolescents // Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. CJASN. 2009. Vol. 4, № 11. P. 1832–1843.
  123. Copeland K.C. et al. Characteristics of Adolescents and Youth with Recent-Onset Type 2 Diabetes: The TODAY Cohort at Baseline // J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2011. Vol. 96, № 1. P. 159– 167.
  124. TODAY Study Group. Rapid Rise in Hypertension and Nephropathy in Youth With Type 2 Diabetes: The TODAY clinical trial // Diabetes Care. 2013. Vol. 36, № 6. P. 1735–1741.
  125. American Diabetes Association. 10. Microvascular Complications and Foot Care: Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes—2018 // Diabetes Care. 2018. Vol. 41, № Supplement 1. P. S105–S118.
  126. Cook J. et al. Angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor therapy to decrease microalbuminuria in normotensive children with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus // J. Pediatr. 1990. Vol. 117, № 1. P. 39–45.
  127. Rudberg S. et al. Enalapril reduces microalbuminuria in young normotensive Type 1 (insulin- dependent) diabetic patients irrespective of its hypotensive effect // Diabetologia. 1990. Vol. 33, № 8. P. 470–476.
  128. Soffer B. et al. A double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-response study of the effectiveness and safety of lisinopril for children with hypertension // Am. J. Hypertens. 2003. Vol. 16, № 10. P. 795– 800.
  129. Catalá-López F. et al. Cardiovascular and Renal Outcomes of Renin–Angiotensin System Blockade in Adult Patients with Diabetes Mellitus: A Systematic Review with Network Meta-Analyses // PLOS Med. / ed. Taal M.W. 2016. Vol. 13, № 3. P. e1001971.
  130. Finn B.P., Fraser B., O’Connell S.M. Supraventricular tachycardia as a complication of severe diabetic ketoacidosis in an adolescent with new-onset type 1 diabetes // BMJ Case Rep. 2018. P. bcr- 2017-222861.
  131. Wolfsdorf J.I. et al. ISPAD Clinical Practice Consensus Guidelines 2018: Diabetic ketoacidosis and the hyperglycemic hyperosmolar state // Pediatr. Diabetes. 2018. Vol. 19. P. 155–177.
  132. Abraham M.B. et al. ISPAD Clinical Practice Consensus Guidelines 2018: Assessment and management of hypoglycemia in children and adolescents with diabetes // Pediatr. Diabetes. 2018. Vol. 19. P. 178–192.
  133. Tinti D., Rabbone I. Mini-doses of glucagon to prevent hypoglycemia in children with type 1 diabetes refusing food: a case series // Acta Diabetol. 2019.
  134. Shun C.B. et al. Thyroid autoimmunity in Type 1 diabetes: systematic review and meta-analysis // Diabet. Med. J. Br. Diabet. Assoc. 2014. Vol. 31, № 2. P. 126–135.
  135. Mahmud F.H. et al. ISPAD Clinical Practice Consensus Guidelines 2018: Other complications and associated conditions in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes // Pediatr. Diabetes. 2018. Vol. 19. P. 275–286.
  136. Pham-Short A. et al. Screening for Celiac Disease in Type 1 Diabetes: A Systematic Review // PEDIATRICS. 2015. Vol. 136, № 1. P. e170–e176.
  137. Dong C. et al. Clinical Assessment of Differential Diagnostic Methods in Infants with Cholestasis due to Biliary Atresia or Non-Biliary Atresia // Curr. Med. Sci. 2018. Vol. 38, № 1. P. 137–143.

Для продолжения работы требуется Регистрация
На предыдущую страницу

Предыдущая страница

Следующая страница

На следующую страницу
Список литературы
На предыдущую главу Предыдущая глава
оглавление
Следующая глава На следующую главу

Оглавление

Данный блок поддерживает скрол*