1. Hamilton В., Martin J., Osterman M., Driscoll A., Rossen L. Births: provisional data for 2016. Vital Statistics Rapid Release No 2. Hyattsville (MD): National Center for Health Statistics; 2017.
2. Curtm S.C., Gregory K.D., Korst L.M., Uddin S.F. Maternal Morbidity for Vaginal and Cesarean Deliveries, According to Previous Cesarean History: New Data From the Birth Certificate, 2013. Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2015; 64(4):1-13, back cover.
3. Guise J.-M., Eden K., Emeis C., Denman M.A., Marshall N., Fu R.R., et al. Vaginal birth after cesarean: new insights. Evid Rep Technol Assess (Full Rep). 2010; (191):l-397.
4. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Vaginal birth after cesarean delivery. ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 205. Obstet Gynecol 2019; 133:el 10-27.
5. Акушерство: национальное руководство I под ред. Г. Μ. Савельевой, Г. Т. Сухих, В. H. Серова, В. E. Paдзинcкoгo. - 2-е изд., пepepaб. и доп. M.: ΓЭOTAP-Meдиa; 2018. 1088 р.
6. Шмаков P.Γ., Баев O.P., Пекарев O.Γ., Πыpeгoв A.B., Kapaпeтян A.O., Πpиxoдькo A.M., et al. Хирургическая тактика операции кесарева сечения. Учебное пособие. /– M: Издательский дом «Бином». 2019. 82 стр.
7. Dodd J.M., Crowther C.A., Huertas E., Guise J.-M., Horey D. Planned elective repeat caesarean section versus planned vaginal birth for women with a previous caesarean birth. Cochrane database Syst Rev. 2013; (12):CD004224.
8. Little M.O., Lyerly A.D., Mitchell L.M., Armstrong E.M., Harris L.H., Kukla R., et al. Mode of delivery: toward responsible inclusion of patient preferences. Obstet Gynecol. 2008; 112(4):913-8.
9. Categorisation of urgency for caesarean section RANZCOG July 2018.
10. Macones G.A., Peipert J., Nelson D.B., Odibo A., Stevens E.J., Stamilio D.M., et al. Maternal complications with vaginal birth after cesarean delivery: a multicenter study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005; 193(5):1656-62.
11. Costantine M.M., Fox K.A., Pacheco L.D., Mateus J., Hankins G.D. V, Grobman W.A., et al. Does information available at delivery improve the accuracy of predicting vaginal birth after cesarean? Validation of the published models in an independent patient cohort. Am J Perinatol. 2011; 28(4):293-8.
12. Chauhan S.P., Martin J.N., Henrichs C.E., Morrison J.C., Magann E.F. Maternal and perinatal complications with uterine rupture in 142,075 patients who attempted vaginal birth after cesarean delivery: A review of the literature. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003; 189(2):408-17.
13. Silver R.M., Landon M.B., Rouse D.J., Leveno K.J., Spong C.Y., Thorn E.A., et al. Maternal morbidity associated with multiple repeat cesarean deliveries. Obstet Gynecol. 2006; 107(6):1226-32.
14. Grantz K.L., Gonzalez-Quinteгo V., Troendle J., Reddy U.M., Hinkle S.N., Kominiarek M.A., et al. Labor patterns in women attempting vaginal birth after cesarean with normal neonatal outcomes. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015; 213(2):226.el-6.
15. Clinical management Guidelines for Obstetrician-Gynecologists. ACOG PRACTICE BULLETIN. Number 184, November 2017.
16. Birth After Previous Caesarean Birth RCOG Green-top Guideline No. 45 October 2015.
17. Kaн H.E., Шмаков P.Γ., Kecoвa M.И., Tютюнник B.Л., Баев O.P., Пекарев O.Γ., et al. Самопроизвольное poдopaзpeшeниe пациентов с рубцом на матке после операции кесарева сечения. Клинический протокол. Акушерство и гинекология. 2016; (12): 129.
18. Chaillet N., Bujold E., Dubé E., Grobman W. A. Validation of a prediction model for vaginal birth after caesarean. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2013; 35(2):119-24.
19. Yokoi A., Ishikawa K., Miyazaki K., Yoshida K., Furuhashi M., Tamakoshi K. Validation of the prediction model for success of vaginal birth after cesarean delivery in Japanese women. Int J Med Sci. 2012; 9(6):488-91.
20. Gambacorti-Passerini Z., Gimovsky A.C., Locatelli A., Berghella V. Trial of labor after myomectomy and uterine rupture: a systematic review. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2016; 95(7):724-34.
21. Пекарев O.Γ., Maйбopoдин И.B., Пекарева E.O., Поздняков И.M. Самопроизвольное poдopaзpeшeниe пациенток с рубцом на матке после кесарева сечения. Реалии и перспективы. Женское здоровье и репродукция. 2018; 9(28).
22. Mone F., Harrity С, Mackie A., Segurado R., Toner В., McCormick T.R., et al. Vaginal birth after caesarean section prediction models: a UK comparative observational study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2015; 193:136-9.
23. Palatnik A., Grobman W.A. Induction of labor versus expectant management for women with a prior cesarean delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015; 212(3):358.el-6.
24. Peaceman A.M., Gersпoviez R., Landon M.B., Spong C.Y., Leveno K.J., Varner M.W., et al. The MFMU Cesarean Registry: impact of fetal size on trial of labor success for patients with previous cesarean for dystocia. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006; 195(4):1127-31.
25. Committee on Practice Bulletins—Obstetrics. Practice Bulletin No 178: Shoulder Dystocia. Obstet Gynecol. 2017; 129(5):el23-33.
26. Grobman W.A., Lai Y., Landon M.B., Spong C.Y., Leveno K.J., Rouse D.J., et al. Development of a nomogram for prediction of vaginal birth after cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 2007; 109(4):806-12.
27. Metz T.D., Allshouse A.A., Faucett A.M., Grobman W.A. Validation of a vaginal birth after cesarean delivery prediction model in women with two prior cesarean deliveries. Obstet Gynecol. 2015; 125(4):948-52.
28. Coassolo K.M., Stamilio D.M., Pare E., Peipert J.F., Stevens E., Nelson D.B., et al. Safety and efficacy of vaginal birth after cesarean attempts at or beyond 40 weeks of gestation. Obstet Gynecol. 2005; 106(4):700-6.
29. Kiran T.S.U., Chui Y.K., Bethel J., Bhal P.S. Is gestational age an independent variable affecting uterine scar rupture rates? Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2006; 126(1):68-71.
30. Obstetric Care Consensus No. 2. Obstet Gynecol. 2015; 125(2):502-15.
31. Grobman W.A., Gilbert S., Landon M.B., Spong C.Y., Leveno K.J., Rouse D.J., et al. Outcomes of induction of labor after one prior cesarean. Obstet Gynecol. 2007; 109(2 Pt l):262-9.