Поиск
Озвучивание недоступно Озвучить книгу
Изменить режим чтения
Изменить размер шрифта
Оглавление
Для озвучивания и цитирования книги перейдите в режим постраничного просмотра.

Список литературы

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

65. Komine-Aizawa S., Takada K., Hayakawa S. Placental barrier against COVID-19. Placenta. 2020 Sep 15; 99: 45–49. doi: 10.1016/j.placenta.2020.07.022. Epub 2020 Jul 25. PMID: 32755724; PMCID: PMC7381919.

Глава 18

1. Whitworth M., Bricker L., Mullan C. Ultrasound for fetal assessment in early pregnancy // Cochrane database of systematic reviews. 2015. № 7.

2. Mercé L.T. Ultrasound markers of implantation // The Ultrasound Review of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2002. Т. 2. № 2. С. 110–123.

3. Aghahoseini M. et al. Assessment of endometrial-subendometrial blood flow detected by color Doppler sonography and uterine receptivity in infertile women // Acta Medica Iranica. 2008. С. 461–466.

4. Ng E.H.Y. et al. The role of endometrial and subendometrial blood flows measured by three-dimensional power Doppler ultrasound in the prediction of pregnancy during IVF treatment // Human Reproduction. 2006. Т. 21, № 1. С. 164–170.

5. Imoedemhe D.A.G. et al. Ultrasound measurement of endometrial thickness on different ovarian stimulation regimens during in-vitro fertilization // Human Reproduction. 1987. Т. 2, № 7. С. 545–547.

6. Ivanovski M. The role of ultrasound in the evaluation of endometrial receptivity following assisted reproductive treatments // In vitro fertilization — innovative clinical and laboratory aspects. 2012. С. 31.

7. Bassil S. Changes in endometrial thickness, width, length and pattern in predicting pregnancy outcome during ovarian stimulation in in vitro fertilization // Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology: The Official Journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2001. Т. 18, № 3. С. 258–263.

8. Friedler S. et al. The role of ultrasonography in the evaluation of endometrial receptivity following assisted reproductive treatments: a critical review // Human reproduction update. 1996. Т. 2, № 4. С. 323–335.

9. Leibovitz Z. et al. Assessment of endometrial receptivity for gestation in patients undergoing in vitro fertilization, using endometrial thickness and the endometrium‐myometrium relative echogenicity coefficient // Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology: The Official Journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology. 1999. Т. 14, № 3. С. 194–199.

10. Dickey R.P. et al. Endometrial pattern and thickness associated with pregnancy outcome after assisted reproduction technologies // Human Reproduction. 1992. Т. 7, № 3. С. 418–421.

11. Lee A. et al. Endometrial volume change during spontaneous menstrual cycles: volumetry by transvaginal three-dimensional ultrasound // Fertility and sterility. 1997. Т. 68, № 5. С. 831–835.

12. Raine‐Fenning N.J. et al. Defining endometrial growth during the menstrual cycle with three‐dimensional ultrasound // BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology. 2004. Т. 111, № 9. С. 944–949.

13. Raga F. et al. Assessment of endometrial volume by three-dimensional ultrasound prior to embryo transfer: clues to endometrial receptivity // Human Reproduction. 1999. Т. 14, № 11. С. 2851–2854.

14. Zollner U. et al. Endometrial volume as assessed by three-dimensional ultrasound is a predictor of pregnancy outcome after in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer // Fertility and sterility. 2003. Т. 80, № 6. С. 1515–1517.

15. Mercé L.T., Barco M.J., Bau S. et al. Are endometrial parameters by three-dimensional ultrasound and power Doppler angiography related to in vitro fertilization embryo transfer outcome? // Fertil Steril. 2008; 89(1): 111–7.

16. Parsons A.K., Parada C., Parsons M. et al. Ultrasound correlation with endometrial histology. Gynecologic investigation, 38th Annual Meeting, San Antonio, Texas, March 20–23, 1991; Abstract 560, P. 378.

17. Tetlow R.L., Richmond I., Manton D.J. et al. Histological analysis of the uterine junctional zone as seen by transvaginal ultrasound. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 1999; 14(3): 188–93.

18. Sher G., Herbert C., Maassarani G. et al. Assessment of the late proliferative phase еndometrium by ultrasonography in patients undergoing in-vitro fertilization and embryo transfer (IVF/ET). Hum Reprod. 1991; 6(2): 232–7.

19. Tan S.L., Zaidi J., Campbell S., Doyle P., Collins W. Blood flow changes in the ovarian and uterine arteries during the normal menstrual cycle. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1996 Sep; 175(3 Pt 1): 625–31.

20. Bourne T.H., Hagström H.G., Granberg S., Josefsson B., Hahlin M., Hellberg P., Hamberger L., Collins W.P. Ultrasound studies of vascular and morphological changes in the human uterus after a positive self-test for the urinary luteinizing hormone surge. Hum Reprod. 1996 Feb; 11(2): 369–75.

21. Mercé L.T. Doppler de los cambios ováricos y endometriales preimplantatorios. In: Kurjak A., Carrera J.M. (Eds). Ecografía en Medicina Materno-Fetal. Barcelona: Masson; 2000. P. 87–104.

22. Costa M.A. The endocrine function of human placenta: an overview. Reprod Biomed Online. 2016 Jan; 32(1): 14–43.

23. Wamaitha S.E., Niakan K.K. Human Pre-gastrulation Development. Curr Top Dev Biol. 2018; 128: 295–338.

24. Goswamy R.K., Williams G., Steptoe P.C. Decreased uterine perfusion — a cause of infertility // Hum Reprod. 1988 Nov; 3(8): 955–9.

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Предыдущая страница

Следующая страница

Список литературы
На предыдущую главу Предыдущая глава
оглавление
Следующая глава