Поиск
Озвучить текст Озвучить книгу
Изменить режим чтения
Изменить размер шрифта
Оглавление
Для озвучивания и цитирования книги перейдите в режим постраничного просмотра.

Список литературы

  1. Менделеева Л.П., Вотякова О.М., Рехтина И.Г. Множественная миелома. Российские клинические рекомендации по диагностике и лечению злокачественных лимфопролиферативных заболеваний. / ed. Поддубной И.В., Савченко В.Г. Москва, 2018. 213–241 p.
  2. Furukawa Y., Kikuchi J. Molecular pathogenesis of multiple myeloma. // Int. J. Clin. Oncol. 2015. Vol. 20, № 3. P. 413–422.
  3. Lewis E.B. Leukemia, Multiple Myeloma, and Aplastic Anemia in American Radiologists // Science (80-. ). 1963. Vol. 142, № 3598. P. 1492–1494.
  4. Linet M.S., Harlow S.D., McLaughlin J.K. A case-control study of multiple myeloma in whites: chronic antigenic stimulation, occupation, and drug use. // Cancer Res. 1987. Vol. 47, № 11. P. 2978–2981.
  5. Hallek M., Bergsagel P.L., Anderson K.C. Multiple myeloma: increasing evidence for a multistep transformation process. // Blood. 1998. Vol. 91, № 1. P. 3–21.
  6. Kuehl W.M., Bergsagel P.L. Molecular pathogenesis of multiple myeloma and its premalignant precursor. // J. Clin. Invest. 2012. Vol. 122, № 10. P. 3456–3463.
  7. Morgan G.J., Walker B.A., Davies F.E. The genetic architecture of multiple myeloma. // Nat. Rev. Cancer. 2012. Vol. 12, № 5. P. 335–348.
  8. Fonseca R. et al. International Myeloma Working Group molecular classification of multiple myeloma: Spotlight review // Leukemia. Nature Publishing Group, 2009. Vol. 23, № 12. P. 2210–2221.
  9. Бессмельцев С.С. Множественная миелома // Вестник гематологии. 2014. Vol. 10, № 3. P. 6–39.
  10. Durie B.G.M., Salmon S.E. A clinical staging system for multiple myeloma correlation of measured myeloma cell mass with presenting clinical features, response to treatment, and survival // Cancer. 1975. Vol. 36, № 3. P. 842–854.
  11. Greipp P.R. et al. International staging system for multiple myeloma // J. Clin. Oncol. 2005. Vol. 23, № 15. P. 3412–3420.
  12. Palumbo A. et al. Revised international staging system for multiple myeloma: A report from international myeloma working group // J. Clin. Oncol. 2015.
  13. D’agostino M. et al. Second Revision of the International Staging System (R2-ISS) for Overall Survival in Multiple Myeloma: A European Myeloma Network (EMN) Report Within the HARMONY Project // J. Clin. Oncol. Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, 2022. Vol. 364.
  14. Rajkumar S.V. et al. International Myeloma Working Group updated criteria for the diagnosis of multiple myeloma // Lancet Oncol. Elsevier Ltd, 2014. Vol. 15, № 12. P. e538–e548.
  15. Kyle R.A., Rajkumar S. V. Criteria for diagnosis, staging, risk stratification and response assessment of multiple myeloma. // Leukemia. 2009. Vol. 23, № 1. P. 3–9.
  16. Moreau P. et al. Multiple myeloma: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up // Ann. Oncol. 2017. Vol. 28, № suppl_4. P. iv52–iv61.
  17. Coppola A. et al. Bleeding and thrombosis in multiple myeloma and related plasma cell disorders. // Semin. Thromb. Hemost. 2011. Vol. 37, № 8. P. 929–945.
  18. Tripathy S. The role of serum protein electrophoresis in the detection of multiple myeloma: An experience of a corporate hospital // J. Clin. Diagnostic Res. 2012. Vol. 6, № 9. P. 1458–1461.
  19. Misra A. et al. Old but Still Relevant: High Resolution Electrophoresis and Immunofixation in Multiple Myeloma // Indian Journal of Hematology and Blood Transfusion. Springer India, 2016. Vol. 32, № 1. P. 10–17.
  20. Любимова Н.В. et al. Свободные легкие цепи иммуноглобулинов в диагностике и прогнозе множественной миеломы. // Альманах клинической медицины. 2017. Vol. 45, № 2. P. 102–108.
  21. Julie D. et al. Comparison of Bone marrow Aspirate and Bone marrow Biopsy in the workup of Patients with Multiple Myeloma // Clin. Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk. Elsevier BV, 2015. Vol. 15. P. e117.
  22. Pianko M.J. et al. Whole-body low-dose computed tomography and advanced imaging techniques for multiple myeloma bone disease // Clinical Cancer Research. American Association for Cancer Research Inc., 2014. Vol. 20, № 23. P. 5888–5897.
  23. Cavo M. et al. Role of 18F-FDG PET/CT in the diagnosis and management of multiple myeloma and other plasma cell disorders: a consensus statement by the International Myeloma Working Group. // Lancet. Oncol. 2017. Vol. 18, № 4. P. e206–e217.
  24. Mateos M.-V., San Miguel J. V. Smoldering multiple myeloma // Hematol. Oncol. 2015. Vol. 33. P. 33–37.
  25. Zou Y. et al. Bortezomib and lenalidomide as front-line therapy for multiple myeloma. // Leuk. Lymphoma. 2014. Vol. 55, № 9. P. 2024–2031.
  26. Mateos M.V. et al. Bortezomib plus melphalan and prednisone compared with melphalan and prednisone in previously untreated multiple myeloma: Updated follow-up and impact of subsequent therapy in the phase III VISTA trial // J. Clin. Oncol. 2010. Vol. 28, № 13. P. 2259–2266.
  27. Bringhen S. et al. Efficacy and safety of once-weekly bortezomib in multiple myeloma patients. // Blood. 2010. Vol. 116, № 23. P. 4745–4753.
  28. Takezako N. et al. The Efficacy and Safety of Weekly Bortezomib Containing VMP Followed By Bortezomib Maintenance Therapy in Unfit or Frail Multiple Myeloma Patients // Blood. 2016. Vol. 128, № 22.
  29. Jagannath S. et al. Extended follow-up of a phase 2 trial of bortezomib alone and in combination with dexamethasone for the frontline treatment of multiple myeloma. // Br. J. Haematol. 2009. Vol. 146, № 6. P. 619–626.
  30. Rampotas A. et al. Efficacy and tolerability of VCD chemotherapy in a UK real-world dataset of elderly transplant-ineligible newly diagnosed myeloma patients // Eur. J. Haematol. Eur J Haematol, 2021. Vol. 106, № 4. P. 563–573.
  31. Saeed N. et al. Real-World Outcomes in Transplant-Ineligible Patients With Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma Treated With Bortezomib/Cyclophosphamide/Dexamethasone and Bortezomib/Lenalidomide/Dexamethasone as Upfront Treatment // Cureus. Cureus, 2024. Vol. 16, № 4.
  32. Dimopoulos M.A. et al. Multiple myeloma: EHA-ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up† // Ann. Oncol. Elsevier, 2021. Vol. 32, № 3. P. 309–322.
  33. Weisel K. et al. A systematic literature review and network meta-analysis of treatments for patients with untreated multiple myeloma not eligible for stem cell transplantation. // Leuk. Lymphoma. 2017. Vol. 58, № 1. P. 153–161.
  34. Benboubker L. et al. Lenalidomide and dexamethasone in transplant-ineligible patients with myeloma // N. Engl. J. Med. Massachussetts Medical Society, 2014. Vol. 371, № 10. P. 906–917.
  35. Facon T. et al. Updated Overall Survival (OS) Analysis of the FIRST Study: Lenalidomide Plus Low-Dose Dexamethasone (Rd) Continuous vs Melphalan, Prednisone, and Thalidomide (MPT) in Patients (Pts) With Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma (NDMM) // Clin. Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk. Elsevier BV, 2015. Vol. 15. P. e134.
  36. Palumbo A. et al. Continuous lenalidomide treatment for newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. // N. Engl. J. Med. 2012. Vol. 366, № 19. P. 1759–1769.
  37. Facon T. et al. Daratumumab plus Lenalidomide and Dexamethasone for Untreated Myeloma // N. Engl. J. Med. Massachusetts Medical Society, 2019. Vol. 380, № 22. P. 2104–2115.
  38. Mateos M. V. et al. Daratumumab plus bortezomib, melphalan, and prednisone for untreated myeloma // N. Engl. J. Med. Massachussetts Medical Society, 2018. Vol. 378, № 6. P. 518–528.
  39. Mateos M.V. et al. Subcutaneous versus intravenous daratumumab in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (COLUMBA): a multicentre, open-label, non-inferiority, randomised, phase 3 trial // Lancet Haematol. Elsevier, 2020. Vol. 7, № 5. P. e370–e380.
  40. Usmani S.Z. et al. Final analysis of the phase III non-inferiority COLUMBA study of subcutaneous versus intravenous daratumumab in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma // Haematologica. Ferrata Storti Foundation, 2022. Vol. 107, № 10. P. 2408–2417.
  41. Durie B.G.M. et al. Longer term follow-up of the randomized phase III trial SWOG S0777: bortezomib, lenalidomide and dexamethasone vs. lenalidomide and dexamethasone in patients (Pts) with previously untreated multiple myeloma without an intent for immediate autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) // Blood Cancer J. Springer Nature, 2020. Vol. 10, № 5.
  42. Durie B.G.M. et al. Bortezomib with lenalidomide and dexamethasone versus lenalidomide and dexamethasone alone in patients with newly diagnosed myeloma without intent for immediate autologous stem-cell transplant (SWOG S0777): a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial // Lancet. Lancet Publishing Group, 2017. Vol. 389, № 10068. P. 519–527.
  43. Larocca A. et al. Patient-centered practice in elderly myeloma patients: an overview and consensus from the European Myeloma Network (EMN) // Leukemia. 2018. Vol. 32. P. 1697–1712.
  44. Kapoor P. et al. Melphalan and prednisone versus melphalan, prednisone and thalidomide for elderly and/or transplant ineligible patients with multiple myeloma: a meta-analysis // Leuk. 2011 254. Nature Publishing Group, 2011. Vol. 25, № 4. P. 689–696.
  45. Gregory W.M., Richards M.A., Malpas J.S. Combination chemotherapy versus melphalan and prednisolone in the treatment of multiple myeloma: an overview of published trials. // https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.1992.10.2.334. Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, 2016. Vol. 10, № 2. P. 334–342.
  46. Su B. et al. A meta-analysis of autologous transplantation for newly diagnosed multiple myeloma in the era of novel agents // Leuk. Lymphoma. Taylor and Francis Ltd, 2018.
  47. Dhakal B. et al. Autologous transplantation for newly diagnosed multiple myeloma in the era of novel agent induction a systematic review and meta-analysis // JAMA Oncol. American Medical Association, 2018. Vol. 4, № 3. P. 343–350.
  48. Nooka A.K. et al. Bortezomib-containing induction regimens in transplant-eligible myeloma patients // Cancer. 2013. Vol. 119, № 23. P. 4119–4128.
  49. Leiba M. et al. Bortezomib-Cyclophosphamide-Dexamethasone (VCD) versus Bortezomib-Thalidomide-Dexamethasone (VTD) -based regimens as induction therapies in newly diagnosed transplant eligible patients with multiple myeloma: A meta-analysis // Br. J. Haematol. Blackwell Publishing Ltd, 2014. Vol. 166, № 5. P. 702–710.
  50. Attal M. et al. Lenalidomide, Bortezomib, and Dexamethasone with Transplantation for Myeloma // N. Engl. J. Med. New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM/MMS), 2017. Vol. 376, № 14. P. 1311–1320.
  51. Rosiñol L. et al. Bortezomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone as induction therapy prior to autologous transplant in multiple myeloma // Blood. American Society of Hematology, 2019. Vol. 134, № 16. P. 1337–1345.
  52. Tuchman S.A., Chao N.J., Gasparetto C.G. Lenalidomide before and after autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in multiple myeloma // Advances in Hematology. 2012. Vol. 2012.
  53. Knop S. et al. Lenalidomide, adriamycin, and dexamethasone (RAD) in patients with relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma: A report from the German Myeloma Study Group DSMM (Deutsche Studiengruppe Multiples Myelom) // Blood. 2009. Vol. 113, № 18. P. 4137–4143.
  54. Reece D.E. et al. Phase I-II trial of oral cyclophosphamide, prednisone and lenalidomide for the treatment of patients with relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma // Br. J. Haematol. Blackwell Publishing Ltd, 2015. Vol. 168, № 1. P. 46–54.
  55. Fung H.C., Nathan S., Maciejewski J.J. Induction chemotherapy before autologous stem cell transplantation for symptomatic plasma cell myeloma - does it matter? // Clin. Pharmacol. 2010. Vol. 2. P. 71–75.
  56. Tuchman S.A. et al. Cyclophosphamide-based hematopoietic stem cell mobilization before autologous stem cell transplantation in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma // J. Clin. Apher. Wiley-Liss Inc., 2015. Vol. 30, № 3. P. 176–182.
  57. Hosing C. Hematopoietic stem cell mobilization with G-CSF // Methods Mol. Biol. Humana Press Inc., 2012. Vol. 904. P. 37–47.
  58. Sivaraj D. et al. High-dose BCNU/Melphalan conditioning regimen before autologous stem cell transplantation in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma // Bone Marrow Transplant. Nature Publishing Group, 2018. Vol. 53, № 1. P. 34–38.
  59. Oliva S. et al. Minimal residual disease after transplantation or lenalidomidebased consolidation in myeloma patients: A prospective analysis // Oncotarget. Impact Journals LLC, 2017. Vol. 8, № 4. P. 5924–5935.
  60. Sonneveld P. et al. Consolidation followed by maintenance vs. maintenance alone in newly diagnosed, transplant eligible multiple myeloma: a randomized phase 3 study of the European Myeloma Network (EMN02/HO95 MM TRIAL) // EHA 23 Proceedings. 2018. P. Abstract S108.
  61. Roussel M. et al. Front-line transplantation program with lenalidomide, bortezomib, and dexamethasone combination as induction and consolidation followed by lenalidomide maintenance in patients with multiple myeloma: a phase II study by the Intergroupe Francophone du Myélo // J. Clin. Oncol. American Society of Clinical Oncology, 2014. Vol. 32, № 25. P. 2712–2717.
  62. Naumann-Winter F. et al. First-line tandem high-dose chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplantation versus single high-dose chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplantation in multiple myeloma, a systematic review of controlled studies. // Cochrane database Syst. Rev. 2012. Vol. 10. P. CD004626.
  63. Nathwani N., Larsen J.T., Kapoor P. Consolidation and Maintenance Therapies for Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma in the Era of Novel Agents // Current Hematologic Malignancy Reports. 2016.
  64. Sonneveld P. et al. Bortezomib Induction and Maintenance Treatment in Patients With Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma: Results of the Randomized Phase III HOVON-65/ GMMG-HD4 Trial // J. Clin. Oncol. 2012. Vol. 30, № 24. P. 2946–2955.
  65. McCarthy P.L. et al. Lenalidomide after stem-cell transplantation for multiple myeloma. // N. Engl. J. Med. 2012. Vol. 366, № 19. P. 1770–1781.
  66. Attal M. et al. Lenalidomide maintenance after stem-cell transplantation for multiple myeloma. // N. Engl. J. Med. 2012. Vol. 366, № 19. P. 1782–1791.
  67. Palumbo A. et al. Autologous Transplantation and Maintenance Therapy in Multiple Myeloma // N. Engl. J. Med. 2014. Vol. 371, № 10. P. 895–905.
  68. Beurden-Tan C.H.Y.V. et al. Systematic literature review and network meta-analysis of treatment outcomes in relapsed and/or refractory multiple myeloma // Journal of Clinical Oncology. American Society of Clinical Oncology, 2017. Vol. 35, № 12. P. 1312–1319.
  69. Knopf K.B. et al. Meta-analysis of the efficacy and safety of bortezomib re-treatment in patients with multiple myeloma. // Clin. Lymphoma. Myeloma Leuk. 2014. Vol. 14, № 5. P. 380–388.
  70. Scott K. et al. Bortezomib for the treatment of multiple myeloma. // Cochrane database Syst. Rev. 2016. Vol. 4. P. CD010816.
  71. Dimopoulos M.A. et al. A Comparison of the Efficacy of Immunomodulatory-containing Regimens in Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma: A Network Meta-analysis // Clin. Lymphoma, Myeloma Leuk. Elsevier Inc., 2018. Vol. 18, № 3. P. 163-173.e6.
  72. Anderson K.C. et al. Lenalidomide, bortezomib, and dexamethasone in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (MM): Encouraging outcomes and tolerability in a phase II study // J. Clin. Oncol. 2009. Vol. 27, № 15 (Suppl.). P. Abstract 8536.
  73. Dimopoulos M. et al. Carfilzomib, dexamethasone, and daratumumab versus carfilzomib and dexamethasone for patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (CANDOR): results from a randomised, multicentre, open-label, phase 3 study // Lancet. Elsevier, 2020. Vol. 396, № 10245. P. 186–197.
  74. Moreau P. et al. Isatuximab, carfilzomib, and dexamethasone in relapsed multiple myeloma (IKEMA): a multicentre, open-label, randomised phase 3 trial // Lancet. Elsevier, 2021. Vol. 397, № 10292. P. 2361–2371.
  75. Shah C. et al. Efficacy and safety of carfilzomib in relapsed and/or refractory multiple myeloma: Systematic review and meta-analysis of 14 trials // Oncotarget. Impact Journals LLC, 2018. Vol. 9, № 34. P. 23704–23717.
  76. Dimopoulos M.A. et al. Carfilzomib or bortezomib in relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (ENDEAVOR): an interim overall survival analysis of an open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial // Lancet Oncol. Lancet Publishing Group, 2017. Vol. 18, № 10. P. 1327–1337.
  77. Moreau P. et al. Oral Ixazomib, Lenalidomide, and Dexamethasone for Multiple Myeloma // N. Engl. J. Med. 2016. Vol. 374, № 17. P. 1621–1634.
  78. Bahlis N.J. et al. Daratumumab plus lenalidomide and dexamethasone in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma: extended follow-up of POLLUX, a randomized, open-label, phase 3 study // Leukemia. Nature Publishing Group, 2020. Vol. 34, № 7. P. 1875.
  79. Mateos M.V. et al. Daratumumab, Bortezomib, and Dexamethasone Versus Bortezomib and Dexamethasone in Patients With Previously Treated Multiple Myeloma: Three-year Follow-up of CASTOR // Clin. Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk. Elsevier, 2020. Vol. 20, № 8. P. 509–518.
  80. Dimopoulos M.A. et al. Elotuzumab plus lenalidomide and dexamethasone in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma: Extended 4-year follow-up and analysis of relative progression-free survival from the randomized ELOQUENT-2 trial // Cancer. John Wiley and Sons Inc., 2018. Vol. 124, № 20. P. 4032–4043.
  81. Miguel J.S. et al. Pomalidomide plus low-dose dexamethasone versus high-dose dexamethasone alone for patients with relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma (MM-003): A randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial // Lancet Oncol. 2013. Vol. 14, № 11. P. 1055–1066.
  82. Lokhorst H.M. et al. Targeting CD38 with Daratumumab Monotherapy in Multiple Myeloma. // N. Engl. J. Med. 2015. Vol. 373, № 13. P. 1207–1219.
  83. Lonial S. et al. Daratumumab monotherapy in patients with treatment-refractory multiple myeloma (SIRIUS): An open-label, randomised, phase 2 trial // Lancet. Lancet Publishing Group, 2016. Vol. 387, № 10027. P. 1551–1560.
  84. Dimopoulos M.A. et al. Elotuzumab plus Pomalidomide and Dexamethasone for Multiple Myeloma // N. Engl. J. Med. New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM/MMS), 2018. Vol. 379, № 19. P. 1811–1822.
  85. Attal M. et al. Isatuximab plus pomalidomide and low-dose dexamethasone versus pomalidomide and low-dose dexamethasone in patients with relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma (ICARIA-MM): a randomised, multicentre, open-label, phase 3 study // Lancet. Lancet Publishing Group, 2019. Vol. 394, № 10214. P. 2096–2107.
  86. Dimopoulos M.A. et al. Daratumumab plus pomalidomide and dexamethasone versus pomalidomide and dexamethasone alone in previously treated multiple myeloma (APOLLO): an open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial // Lancet Oncol. Elsevier, 2021. Vol. 22, № 6. P. 801–812.
  87. Tsang R.W. et al. Radiation Therapy for Solitary Plasmacytoma and Multiple Myeloma: Guidelines From the International Lymphoma Radiation Oncology Group. // Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 2018. Vol. 101, № 4. P. 794–808.
  88. Mark D. et al. Local Radiation Therapy for Palliation in Patients With Multiple Myeloma of the Spine. // Front. Oncol. 2019. Vol. 9. P. 601.
  89. Sonneveld P., Broijl A. Treatment of relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma // Haematologica. Ferrata Storti Foundation, 2016. Vol. 101, № 4. P. 396–406.
  90. Punke A.P., Waddell J.A., Solimando D.A. Lenalidomide, bortezomib, and dexamethasone (RVD) regimen for multiple myeloma // Hosp. Pharm. SAGE Publications Ltd, 2017. Vol. 52, № 1. P. 27–32.
  91. Dimopoulos M.A. et al. Renal impairment in patients with multiple myeloma: A consensus statement on behalf of the International Myeloma Working Group // Journal of Clinical Oncology. American Society of Clinical Oncology , 2010. Vol. 28, № 33. P. 4976–4984.
  92. Соловьев М.В., Соловьева М.В., Менделеева Л.П. Сопроводительная терапия при множественной миеломе: практические рекомендации // Клиническая онкогематология. 2023. Vol. 16, № 4. P. 426–448.
  93. Compagno N. et al. Immunoglobulin Replacement Therapy in Secondary Hypogammaglobulinemia // Front. Immunol. Frontiers Media SA, 2014. Vol. 5, № DEC.
  94. Roy V. et al. Hematopoietic Growth Factors. NCCN Guidelines. Ver 1.2022. 2022.
  95. Абузарова Г.Р. et al. Обезболивание взрослых и детей при оказании медицинской помощи. Методические рекомендации. ФГБОУ ВО РНИМУ им. Н.И. Пирогова Минздрава России., 2016. 94 p.
  96. Durie B.G.M. et al. International uniform response criteria for multiple myeloma // Leukemia. Nature Publishing Group, 2006. Vol. 20, № 9. P. 1467–1473.
  97. Rajkumar S.V. et al. Consensus recommendations for the uniform reporting of clinical trials: Report of the International Myeloma Workshop Consensus Panel 1 // Blood. 2011. Vol. 117, № 18. P. 4691–4695.
  98. Kumar S. et al. International Myeloma Working Group consensus criteria for response and minimal residual disease assessment in multiple myeloma // Lancet Oncol. Elsevier, 2016. Vol. 17, № 8. P. e328–e346.
  99. Paul K.L. Rehabilitation and exercise considerations in hematologic malignancies. // Am. J. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 2011. Vol. 90, № 5 Suppl 1. P. S88-94.
  100. Jones J.R. et al. Second malignancies in the context of lenalidomide treatment: an analysis of 2732 myeloma patients enrolled to the Myeloma XI trial // Blood Cancer J. 2016. Vol. 6, № 12. P. e506.
  101. Rajkumar S.V. et al. Lenalidomide plus high-dose dexamethasone versus lenalidomide plus low-dose dexamethasone as initial therapy for newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: an open-label randomised controlled trial // Lancet Oncol. Lancet Publishing Group, 2010. Vol. 11, № 1. P. 29–37.
  102. Weisel K. et al. Daratumumab plus lenalidomide and dexamethasone (D-Rd) versus lenalidomide and dexamethasone (Rd) alone in transplant-ineligible patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM): updated analysis of the phase 3 MAIA study // HemaSphere. Wolters Kluwer Health, 2023. Vol. 7, № Suppl.
  103. Popat R. et al. Bortezomib, doxorubicin and dexamethasone (PAD) front-line treatment of multiple myeloma: updated results after long-term follow-up // Br. J. Haematol. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, 2008. Vol. 141, № 4. P. 512–516.
  104. Dadacaridou M. et al. Dexamethasone, cyclophosphamide, etoposide and cisplatin (DCEP) for relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma patients. // J. BUON. Vol. 12, № 1. P. 41–44.
  105. Oken M.M. et al. Toxicity and response criteria of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group // Am. J. Clin. Oncol. 1982. Vol. 5, № 6. P. 649–655.

Для продолжения работы требуется Registration
На предыдущую страницу

Предыдущая страница

Следующая страница

На следующую страницу
Список литературы
На предыдущую главу Предыдущая глава
оглавление
Следующая глава На следующую главу