Список литературы

Поставить закладку

Российские клинические рекомендации. Ревматология / под ред. Е. Л. Насонова. – М.: ГЭОТАР-Медиа, 2017. – 464 с.
Mease P.J. Psoriatic arthritis: Update on pathophysiology, assessement and management. Ann Rheum Dis. 2011;70 (Suppl 1):i77–84.
Alinaghi F., Calov M., Kristensen L.E. et al. Prevalence of psoriatic arthritis in patients with psoriasis: A systematic review and meta-analysis of observational and clinical studies. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2019;80 (1):251–265.
Gladman D.D., Shuckett R., Russell M.L.et al. Psoriatic arthritis (PSA) – an analysis of 220 patients. Q J Med. 1987; 62 (238): 127–141.
Olivieri I., Padula A., D’Angelo S., Cutro M.S. Psoriatic arthritis sine psoriasis. J Rheumatol Suppl. 2009; 83: 28–29.
Shah K., Paris M., Mellars L. et al. Real-world burden of comorbidies in US patients with psoriatic arthritis. RMD Open. 2017;3 (2):e000588.
Sieper J., Rudwaleit M., Baraliakos X. et al. The Assessment of Spondylosrthritis Internationbal Society (ASAS) handbook: a guide to assess spondyloarthritis. AnnRheumDis. 2009;68 (Suppl.2):ii1–ii44.
Punzi L., Podswiadek M., Oliviero F. et al. Laboratory findings in psoriatic arthritis. Reumatismo. 2007; 59(Suppl. 1): 52–55.
Chandran V., Maharaj A.B. Assessing disease activity in psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis: impact on management and therapy. Expert Rev Clin Immunol. 2016; 12 (5): 573–582.
Quedraogo D.D., Palazzo E., Nicaise-Roland P. et al. Anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide antibodies (CCP2) in patients with psoriatic arthritis. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2007; 25 (6): 930–931.
Alenius G.M., Berglin E., Rantapaa Dahlqvist S. Antibodies against cyclic citrullinated peptide (CCP) in psoriatic patients with or without joint inflammation. AnnRheumDis. 2006; 65 (3): 398–400.
Queiro R., Sarasqueta C., Belzunequi J. et al. Psoriatic Spondyloarthropathy: a Comparative study between HLA-B27 positive and HLA-B27 negative disease. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2002; 31 (6): 413–418.
Rudwaleit M., van der Heijde D., Landewe R. et al. The development of Assessment of SpondyloArthritis international Society classification criteria for axial spondyloarthritis (part II): validation and final selection. Ann Rheum Dis. 2009; 68 (6):777–783.
AlJohani R., Polachek A., Ye J.Y.et al. Characteristic and outcome of psoriatic arthritispatients with hyperuricemia. J Rheumatol. 2018;45(2):213–217.
Kwon H.H., Kwon I.H., Choi J.W. et al. Cross-sectional study on the correlation of serum uric acid with disease severity in Korean patients with psoriasis. Clin Exp Dermatol. 2011;36(5):473–478.
Inaba S., Sautin Y., Garcia G.E. et al. What can asymptomatic hyperuricemia and systemic inflammation in the abcence of gout tell us? Rheumatol. 2013; 52 (6):963–965.
Liu M., Li J.H., Li B. et al. Coexisting gout, erythrodermic psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis. Eur JDermatol. 2009; 19(2): 184–185.
Galozzi P., Oliviero F., Frallonardo P. et al. The prevalence of monosodium urate and calcium perophosphate crystals in synovial fluid from wrist and finger joints. Rheumatol Int. 2016; 36(3):443–446.
Gladman D.D., Chandran V. Standardizing the monitoring of outcome measures: imaging in psoriatic arthritis. Int J Clin Rheumatol. 2011;6:77–86.
Poggenborg R.P., Østergaard M., Terslev L. Imaging in psoriatic arthritis. Rheum Dis Clin North Am. 2015;41 (4):593–613.
Mandl P., Navarro-Compan V., Terslev L. et al. EULAR recommendations for the use of imaging in the diagnosis and management of spondyloarthritis in clinical practice. Ann Rheum Dis. 2015; 74 (7): 1327–1339
Ory P.A., Gladman D.D., Mease P.J. Psoriatic arthritis and imaging. Ann Rheum Dis. 2005; 64 (Suppl II):ii55–ii57.
Sudoł-Szopińska I., Matuszewska G., Kwiatkowska B. et al. Diagnostic imaging of psoriatic arthritis. Part I: etiopathogenesis, classifications and radiographic features. J Ultrason. 2016; 16 (64): 65–77.
Laiho K., Kauppi M. The cervical spine in patients with psoriatic arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2002;61 (7):650–652
Machado P., Landewe R., Braun J. et al. Both structural damage and inflammation of the spine contribute to impairment of spinal mobility in patients with ankylosing spondylitis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2010;69 (8):1465–1470.
Lambert R.G., Bakker P.A., van der Heijde D. et al. Defining active sacroiliitis on MRI for classification of axial spondyloarthritis: update by the ASAS MRI working group. Ann Rheum Dis. 2016;75 (11):1958–1963.
Baraliakos X., Hermann K.G., Landewé R. et al. Assessment of acute spinal inflammation in patients with ankylosing spondylitis by magnetic resonance imaging: a comparison between contrast enhanced T1 and short tau inversion recovery (STIR) sequences. Ann Rheum Dis. 2005;64 (8):1141–1144.
Bennett A.N., Rehman A., Hensor E.M. et al. Evaluation of the diagnostic utility of spinal magnetic resonance imaging in axial spondylarthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 2009;60 (5):1331–1341.
Schueller-Weidekamm C., Mascarenhas V.V., Sudol-Szopinska I. et al. Imaging and interpretation of axial spondylarthritis: The radiologist’s perspective–consensus of the arthritis subcommittee of the ESSR. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol. 2014;18 (3):265–279.
Haque N., Lories R.J., de Vlam K.Orthopaedic interventions in patients with psoriatic arthritis: a descriptive report from the SPAR cohort. RMD Open. 2016 Aug 17;2(2):e000293.
Taylor W.J., Gladman D.D., Helliwell P.S. et al. Classiﬁcation criteria for psoriatic arthritis: development of new criteria from a large international study. Arthritis Rheum. 2006; 54 (8): 2665–2673.
Sieper J., van der Heijde D., Landewe R. et al. New criteria for inflammatory back pain in patients with chronic back pain: a real patient exercise by experts from the Assessment of SpondyloArthritis International Society (ASAS). Ann Rheum Dis. 2009; 68 (6): 784–788.
Chandran V., Barrett J., Schentag N.C. et al. Axial Psoriatic Arthritis: update on a long-term prospective study. J Rheumatol. 2009; 36 (12); 2744–2750.
Wong P.C., Leung Y.Y., Li E.K. Measuring disease activity in psoriatic arthritis. Int J Rheumatol. 2012, 2012: 839425.
Selmi C, Gershwin ME. Diagnosis and classification of reactive arthritis. Autoimmun Rev. 2014; 13(4–5):546–549.
Mitulescu T.C., Popescu C., Naie A. et al. Acute anterior uveitis and other extra-articular manifestations of spondyloarthritis. J Med Life. 2015;8 (3):319–325.
Абдулганиева Д.И., Бакулев А.Л., Белоусова Е.А. и соавт. Проект междисциплинарных рекомендаций по диагностике, методам оценки степени активности воспалительного процесса, терапевтической эффективности и применению генно-инженерных биологических препаратов у пациентов с сочетанными иммуновоспалительными заболеваниями (псориаз, псориатический артрит, болезнь Крона) Альманах клинической медицины. 2018; 46 (6): 426–444.
Sivamani R., Goodarzi H., Garcia M.S. et al. Biological therapies in the treatment of psoriasis: a comprehensive evidence-based basic science and clinical review and a practical guide to tuberculosis monitoring. Clin Rev Allergy Immunol. 2013;44(2):121–140.
Siegel E.L., Orbai A.M., Ritchlin C.T. Targeting extra-articular manifestations in PsA: a closer look at enthesitis and dactylitis. Curr Opin Rheumatol. 2015;27 (2):111–117.
Geijer M., Lindqvist U., Husmark T. et al. The Swedish early psoriatic arthritis registry 5-year follow-up: substantial radiographic progression mainly in men with high disease activity and development of dactylitis. J Rheumatol. 2015;42 (11):210–217.
Smolen J., Schols M., Braun J. et al. Treating axial spondyloarthritis and peripheral spondyloarthritis, especially psoriatic arthritis, to target: 2017 update of recommendations by an international task force. Ann Rheum Dis. 2017; 77 (1): 3–17.
Kershbaumer A., Baker D., Smolen J.S. et al. The effect of structural damage on functional disability in psoriatic arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2017;76(12):2038–2045.
Aletaha D., Alasti F., Smolen J.S. Disease activity states of the DAPSA, a psoriatic arthritis specific instrument, are valid against functional status and structural progression. AnnRheumDis. 2017; 76(2):418–421.
Лукина Г.В., Борисов С.Е. Скрининг и мониторинг туберкулезной инфекции у больных ревматическими заболеваниями, получающими генно-инженерные биологические препараты. В кн. Российские рекомендации. Ревматология. Под ред. Е.Л. Насонова. М., ГЭОТАР-Медиа, 2017. С.394–410.
Ritchlin C.T., Stahle M., Poulin Y. et al. Serious infections in patients with self-reported psoriatic arthritis from the Psoriasis Longitudinal Assessment and Registry (PSOLAR) treated with biologics.BMC Rheumatol. 2019;3:52.
Minozzi S., Bonovas S., Lytras T. et al. Risk of infections using anti-TNF agents in rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis, and ankylosing spondylitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Expert Opin Drug Saf. 2016;15(sup1):11–34.
Gisondi P., Tessari G., Conti A. et al. Prevalence of metabolic syndrome in patients with psoriasis: a hospital-based case-control study. Br J Dermatol. 2007;157(1):68–73.
Coto-Segura P., Eiris-Salvado N., González-Lara L. et al. Psoriasis, psoriatic arthritis and type 2 diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Dermatol. 2013;169(4):783–793.
Coates L.C., Moverley A.R., McParland L. et al. Effect of tight control inflammation in early psoriatic arthritis (TICOPA): a UK multicenter, open-label, randomized controlled trial. Lancet. 2015;386 (10012):2489–2498.
Gossec L., McGonagle D., Korotaeva T. et al. Minimal disease activity as a treatment target in psoriatic arthritis: a review of the literature. J Rheumatol. 2018;45 (1):6–13.
Гараева З.Ш., Юсупова Л.А., Мавлютова Г.И., Юнусова Е.И.Псориатический артрит. Современные аспекты диагностики и лечения. Лечащий врач. 2015; 4: 36–38.
Коротаева Т.В. Современные возможности терапии псориатического артрита. Современнаяревматология.2008; 2 (2): 13–19.
Мусина Ф.С., Хамидуллин Р.Т., Мельникова Т.А. и др. Особенности клинической картины и лечения псориатического артрита. Практическая медицина. 2011; 4 (52): 32–36.
Leatham P.A., Bird H.A., Wright V., Fowler P.D. The run-in period in trial design: A comparison of two non-steroidal anti-inflammatory agents in psoriatic arthropathy. Agents Actions. 1982; 12 (1–2): 221–224.
Sarzi-Puttini P., Santandrea S., Boccassini L. et al. The role of NSAIDs in psoriatic arthritis: evidence from a controlled study with nimesulide. ClinExpRheumatol. 2001;19(1 Suppl 22):S17–20.
Якубович А.И., Салдамаева Л.С., Новицкая Н.Н. Применение нимесулида в комплексном лечении псориатического артрита. Сибирский медицинский журнал (Иркутск). 2010; 94 (3): 114–116.
Алексеева Л.И., Коваленко П.С. Мелоксикам в ревматологической практике: история применения в терапии боли.Современная ревматология. 2016;10(2):50–55.
Мельникова Т.А., Мусина Ф.С., Хамидуллин Р.Т. и др. Нестероидные противовоспалительные препараты в купировании суставного синдрома у больных псориатическим артритом. Медицинский вестник Башкортостана. 2012; 7 (5): 87–90.
Ибрагимов Ш.И. Применение напросина в комплексном лечении больных псориатическим артритом. Вестник дерматологии и венерологии. 1983; 5: 51–53.
Kivitz A.J., Espinoza L.R., Sherrer Y.R. et al. A comparison of the efficacy and safety of celecoxib 200 mg and celecoxib 400 mg once daily in treating the signs and symptoms of psoriatic arthritis. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2007;37(3):164–173.
Шостак Н.А., ПравдюкН.Г. Хронический болевой синдром в нижней части спины –дифференциальная диагностика, подходы к терапии. Современная ревматология. 2009; 3 (3): 8–10.
СтуденикинВ.М., ТурсунхужаеваC.Ш., ШелковскийВ.И. Ибупрофениегоприменениевпедиатрииидетскойневрологии. Вопросы практической педиатрии. 2010; 5 (5):140–144.
Шахтмейстер И.Я., Каменных Е.В. Вольтарен-гель в комплексном лечении больных псориатическим артритом. Вестник дерматологии и венерологии. 1990; 10: 55–57.
Gossec L., Smolen J., Gaujoux-Viala C. et al. European League Against Rheumatism recommendations for the management of psoriatic arthritis with pharmacological therapies. Ann Rheum Dis. 2012; 71 (1): 4–12.
Олюнин Ю.А. Внутрисуставные инъекции лекарственных препаратов в комплексном лечении ревматических заболеваний. Современнаяревматология.2015;(1):78–83.
Ramiro S., Smolen J.S., Landewé R. et al. Pharmacological treatment of psoriatic arthritis: a systematic literature review for the 2015 update of the EULAR recommendations for the management of psoriatic arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2016;75 (3):490–498
Coates L.C., Kavanaugh A., Mease P. et al. GRAPPA 2015 Treatment Recommendations for Psoriatic Arthritis. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2016;68 (5):1060–1071.
Jones G., Crotty M., Brooks P. Interventions for psoriatic arthritis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2000; 3: CD000212.
Schiff M.H., Jaffe J.S., Freundlich B. Head-to-head, randomised, crossover study of oral versus subcutaneous methotrexate in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: drug-exposure limitations of oral methotrexate at doses >/=15 mg may be overcome with subcutaneous administration. Ann Rheuma Dis. 2014;73 (8):1549–1551.
Carrascosa J.M., de la Cueva P., Ara M. et al. Methotrexate in moderate to severe psoriasis: review of the literature and expert recommendations. Actas Dermosifiliogr. 2016;107 (3):194–206.
Menter A., Gelfand J.M., Connor C. et al. Joint American Academy of Dermatology – National Psoriasis Foundation guidelines of care for the management of psoriasis with systemic non-biological therapies. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2020; 82 (6): 1445–1486.
Mease P.J., Gladman D.D., Collier D.H. et al. Etanercept and methotrexate as monotherapy or in combination for psoriatic arthritis: primary results from a randomized, controlled phase III trial. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2019;71 (7):1112–1124.
Coates L.C., Helliwell P.S. Methotrexate efficacy in the tight control in psoriatic arthritis study. J Rheumatol. 2016;43 (2):356–361.
Warren R.B., Weatherhead S.C., Smith C.H. et al. British Association of Dermatologists’ guidelines for the safe and effective prescribing of methotrexate for skin disease 2016. Br J Dermatol. 2016; 175 (1): 23–44.
Busger Op Vollenbroek F.T., Doggen C.J., Janssens R.W., Bernelot Moens H.J. Dermatological guidelines for monitoring methotrexate treatment reduce drug-survival compared to rheumatological guidelines. PLoS One. 2018; 13 (3): e0194401.
Curtis J.R., Beukelman T., Onofrei A. et al. Elevated liver enzyme test among patients with rheumatoid arthritis or psoriatic arthritis treated with methotrexate and/or leflunomide. Ann Rheum Dis. 2010;69 (1):43–47.
Lewkowicz D., Gottlieb A.B. Pediatric psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis. Dermatol Ther. 2004; 17 (5): 364–375.
Чебышева С.Н., Жолобова Е.С., Геппе Н.А. идр. Современные методы диагностики и лечения псориатического артрита у детей. Лечащий врач. 2010; 4: 34.
Чебышева С.Н., Жолобова Е.С., Геппе Н.А. и др. Положительный опыт применения препарата метотрексат у подростка с псориатическим артритом. Лечащий врач. 2017; 4: 47.
Kaltwasser J.P., Nash P., Gladman D. et al. Efficacy and safety of leﬂunomide in the treatment of psoriatic arthritis and psoriasis: a multinational, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial. Arthritis Rheum. 2004;50 (6):1939–1950.
Clegg D.O., Reda D.J., Mejias E. et al. Comparison of sulfasalazine and placebo in the treatment of psoriatic arthritis. A Department of Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study. Arthritis Rheum. 1996; 39 (12): 2013–2020.
Salvarani C., Macchioni P., Olivieri I. et al. A comparison of cyclosporine, sulfasalazine, and symptomatic therapy in the treatment of psoriatic arthritis. JRheumatol. 2001;28 (10):2274–2282.
Mahrle G., Schulze H.J., Brautigam M. et al. Anti-inflammatory efficacy of low-dose cyclosporin A in psoriatic arthritis: a prospective multicentre study. Br J Dermatol. 1996; 135 (5):752–757.
Steinsson K., Jónsdóttir I., Valdimarsson H.Cyclosporin A in psoriatic arthritis: an open study. Ann Rheum Dis. 1990;49(8):603–606.
Kavanaugh A., Gladman D.D., Edwards C.J.et al. Long-term experience with apremilast in patients with psoriatic arthritis: 5-year results from a PALACE 1–3 pooled analysis. Arthritis ResTher. 2019; 21 (1):118.
Mease P., Hall S., FitzGerald O. et al. Tofacitinib or adalimumab versus placebo for psoriatic arthritis. N Engl J Med. 2017;377 (16):1537–1550.
Gladman D., Rigby W., Azevedo V.F. et al. Tofacitinib for psoriatic arthritis in patients with an inadequate response to TNF inhibitors. N Engl J Med. 2017;377 (16):1525–1536.
EMA confirms Xeljanz to be used with caution in patients at high risk of blood clots. Available: https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/news/ema-confirms-xeljanz-be-usedcaution-patients-high-risk-blood-clots [Accessed 2 Apr 2020].
Antoni C., Krueger G.G., de Vlam K. et al. Infliximab improves signs and symptoms of psoriatic arthritis: results of the IMPACT 2 trial. Ann Rheum Dis. 2005; 64 (8): 1150–1157.
Mease P.J., Gladman D.D., Ritchlin C.T. et al. Adalimumab for the treatment of patients with moderately to severely active psoriatic arthritis. Results of a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial. Arthritis Rheum. 2005; 52 (10): 3279–3289.
Mease P.J., Goffe B.S., Metz J. et al. Etanercept in the treatment of psoriatic arthritis and psoriasis: a randomised trial. Lancet. 2000; 356 (9227): 385–390.
Foeldvari I., Constantin T., Vojinović J.et al. Etanercept treatment for extended oligoarticular juvenile idiopathic arthritis, enthesitis-related arthritis, or psoriatic arthritis: 6-year efficacy and safety data from an open-label trial. Arthritis Res Ther. 2019;21(1):125.
Constantin T., Foeldvari I., Vojinovic J.et al. Two-year efficacy and safety of etanercept in pediatric patients with extended oligoarthritis, enthesitis-related arthritis, or psoriatic arthritis. J Rheumatol. 2016;43(4):816–824.
Moretti D., Cianchi I., Vannucci G. et al. Psoriatic juvenile idiopathic arthritis associated with uveitis: a case report. Case Rep Rheumatol. 2013;2013:595890.
Kavanaugh A., McInnes I., Mease P. et al. Golimumab, a new human tumor necrosis factor alpha antibody, administered every four weeks as a subcutaneous injection in psoriatic arthritis. Twenty-four-week efficacy and safety results of a randomized, placebo-controlled study. Arthritis Rheum. 2009; 60 (4): 976–986.
Mease P.J., Fleischmann R., Deodhar A.A. et al. Effect of certolizumab pegol on signs and symptoms in patients with psoriatic arthritis: 24-week results of a phase 3 double-blind randomised placebo-controlled study (RAPID-PsA). Ann Rheum Dis. 2014; 73 (1): 48–55.
McInnes I., Kavanaugh A., Gottlieb A. et al. Efficacy and safety of ustekinumab in patients with active psoriatic arthritis: 1 year results of the phase 3, multicentre, double-blind, placebo-controlled PSUMMIT 1 trial. Lancet. 2013; 382 (9894): 780–789.
Mease P.J., van der Heijde D., Ritchlin C.T. et al. Ixekizumab, an interleukin-17A specific monoclonal antibody, for the treatment of biologic-naive patients with active psoriatic arthritis: results from the 24-week randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled and active (adalimumab)-controlled period of the phase III trial SPIRIT-P1. Ann Rheum Dis. 2017;76 (1):79–87.
Nash P., Kirkham B., Okada M. et al. Ixekizumab for the treatment of patients with active psoriatic arthritis and an inadequate response to tumour necrosis factor inhibitors: results from the 24-week randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled period of the SPIRIT-P2 phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2017;389 (10086):2317–2327.
Mease P.J., Smolen J.S., Behrens F. et al. A head-to-head comparison of the efficacy and safety of ixekizumab and adalimumab in biological-naïve patients with active psoriatic arthritis: 24-week results of a randomised, open-label, blinded-assessor trial. Ann Rheum Dis. 2020;79:123–131.
McInnes I.B., Mease P.J., Kirkham B. et al. Secukinumab, a human antiinterleukin-17A monoclonal antibody, in patients with psoriatic arthritis (FUTURE 2): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase-3 trial. Lancet. 2015;386(9999):1137–1146.
Mease P., van der Heijde D., Landewé R. et al. Secukinumab improves active psoriatic arthritis symptoms and inhibits radiographic progression: primary results from the randomised, double-blind, phase III FUTURE 5 study. Ann Rheum Dis. 2018;77 (6): 890–897.
Kavanaugh A., McInnes I.B., Mease P.J. et al. Efficacy of subcutaneous secukinumab in patients with active psoriatic arthritis stratified by prior tumor necrosis factor inhibitor use: results from the randomized placebo-controlled FUTURE 2 study. J Rheumatol. 2016;43 (9):1713–1717.
Guldberg-Møller J., Cordtz R.L., Kristensen L.E. et al. Incidence and time trends of joint surgery in patients with psoriatic arthritis: a register-based time series and cohort study from Denmark. Ann Rheum Dis. 2019;78 (11):1517–1523.
Roger-Silva D., Natour J., Moreira E. et al. A resistance exercise program improves functional capacity of patients with psoriatic arthritis: a randomized controlled trial. Clin Rheumatol. 2018;37 (2):389–395.
Klingberg E., Björkman S., Eliasson B. et al. Weight loss improves disease activity in patients with psoriatic arthritis and obesity: an interventional study. Arthritis Res Ther. 2020;22(1):254.
Coates L.C., Savage L.J., Chinoy H. et al. Assessment of two screening tools to identify psoriatic arthritis in patients with psoriasis. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2018; 32 (9): 1530–1534.
Gisondi P., Altomare G., Ayala F. et al. Consensus on the management of patients with psoriatic arthritis in a dermatology setting. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2018; 32 (4): 515–528.
Ogdie A., Yu Y., Haynes K. et al. Risk of major cardiovascular events in patients with psoriatic arthritis, psoriasis and rheumatoid arthritis: a population-based cohort study. Ann Rheum Dis. 2015;74 (2):326–332.
Hojgaard P., Glintborg B., Kristensen L.E. et al. The influence of obesity on response to tumour necrosis factor-α inhibitors in psoriatic arthritis: results from the DANBIO and ICEBIO registries. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2016;55 (12):2191–2199.
Tillett W., Jadon D., Shaddick G. et al. Smoking and delay to diagnosis are associated with poorer functional outcome in psoriatic arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2013; 72 (8): 1358–1361.
Taylor W.J., Harrison A.A. Could the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) be a valid measure of disease activity in patients with psoriatic arthritis? Arthritis Rheum. 2004; 51(3): 311–315.
Fernandez-Sueiro J.L., Willisch A., Pertega-Diaz S. et al. Validity of the bath ankylosing spondylitis disease activity index for the evaluation of disease activity in axial psoriatic arthritis. Arthritis Care Res.2010; 62(1):78–85.
Eder L., Chandran V., Shen H. et al. Is ASDAS better than BASDAI as a measure of disease activity in axial psoriatic arthritis? Ann Rheum Dis. 2010; 69: 2160–2164.
Healy P.J., Helliwell P.S. Measuring clinical enthesitis in psoriatic arthritis: assessment of existing measures and development of an instrument specific to psoriatic arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 2008;59(5):686–691.
Schloes M., Aletaha D., Alasti F. et al. Disease activity in psoriatic arthritis (PsA): defining remission and treatment success using the DAPSA score. Ann Rheum Dis. 2016; 75 (5): 811–818.
Schoels M., Aletaha D., Funovits J. et al. Application of the DAREA/DAPSA score for assessment of disease activity in psoriatic arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2010; 69 (8): 1441–1447.
Salaffi F., Ciapetti A., Carotti M. et al. Disease activity in psoriatic arthritis: Comparison of the discriminative capacity and construct validity of six composite indices in a real world. BioMed Res Int. 2014, 2014: 528105.
Mease P.J. Assessment tools in psoriatic arthritis. J Rheumatol. 2008; 35: 1426–1430.
Mease P.J., Antoni C.E., Gladman D.D. et al. Psoriatic arthritis assessment tools in clinical trials. Ann Rheum Dis. 2005; 64 Suppl. 2:ii49–54.
Fransen J., Antoni C., Mease P.J. et al. Performance of response criteria for assessing peripheral arthritis in patients with psoriatic arthritis: analysis of data from randomised controlled trials of two tumour necrosis factor inhibitors. Ann Rheum Dis. 2006; 65 (10): 1373–1378.
Ibrahim G., Buch M., Lawson C. et al. Evaluation of an existing screening tool for psoriatic arthritis in people with psoriasis and the development of a new instrument: the Psoriasis Epidemiology Screening Tool (PEST) questionnaire. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2009; 27 (3): 469–474.
Fonseca J.E., Lucas H., Canhao H. et al. Recommendations for the diagnosis and treatment of latent and active tuberculosis in inflammatory joint diseases candidates for therapy with tumor necrosis factor alpha inhibitors: March 2008 update. Acta Reumatol Port. 2008; 33 (1): 77–85.
Pérez-Alvarez R., Díaz-Lagares C., García-Hernández F.et al. Hepatitis B virus (HBV) reactivation in patients receiving tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-targeted therapy: analysis of 257 cases. Medicine (Baltimore). 2011; 90 (6): 359–371.
Glintborg B., Ostergaard M., Dreyer L. et al. Treatment response, drug survival, and predictors thereof in 764 patients with psoriatic arthritis treated with anti-tumor necrosis factor alpha therapy: results from the nationwide Danish DANBIO registry. Arthritis Rheum. 2011; 63 (2): 382–390.
CozziF, RaffeinerB, BeltrameV.etal. Effect of mud-bath therapy in psoriatic arthritis patients treated with TNF inhibitors. Clinical evaluation and assessment of synovial inflammation by contrast-enchanced ultrasound (CEUS). Joint Bone Spine.2015;82(2):104–108.
127. Инструкция по медицинскому применению лекарственного препарата «Скайризи», ЛП-006460 утверждена Минздравом России 14.09.2020 г.
128. Gordon KB, Strober B, Lebwohl M, et al. Effiacy and safety of risankizumab in moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis (UltIMMa-1 and UltIMMa-2): results from two double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled and ustekinumab-controlled phase 3 trials. Lancet. 2018;392:650-661. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31713-6.
129. Reich K, Gooderham M, Thaçi D, et al. Risankizumab compared with adalimumab in patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis (IMMvent): a randomised, double-blind, active-comparator-controlled phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2019 Aug 17;394(10198):576-586
130. Warren, R., Blauvelt, A., Poulin, Y., Beeck, S., Kelly, M., Wu, T., Geng, Z. and Paul, C. (2021), Efficacy and safety of risankizumab vs. secukinumab in patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis (IMMerge): results from a phase III, randomized, open-label, efficacy–assessor-blinded clinical trial*. Br J Dermatol, 184: 50-59. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjd.19341
Blauvelt A, Leonardi CL, Gooderham M, Papp KA, Philipp S, Wu JJ, Igarashi A, Flack M, Geng Z, Wu T, Camez A, Williams D, Langley RG. Efficacy and Safety of Continuous Risankizumab Therapy vs Treatment Withdrawal in Patients With Moderate to Severe Plaque Psoriasis: A Phase 3 Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Dermatol. 2020 Jun 1;156(6):649-658. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2020.0723.
Kristensen L.E., Keiserman M., Papp K. et al. Efficacy and safety of risankizumab for active psoriatic arthritis: 24-week results from the randomised, double-blind, phase 3 KEEPsAKE 1 trial. Ann Rheum Dis 2021;0:1–7.
Östör A., Filip Van den Bosch, Papp K. et al. Efficacy and safety of risankizumab for active psoriatic arthritis: 24-week results from the randomised, double-blind, phase 3 KEEPsAKE 2 trial. Ann Rheum Dis 2021;0:1–8.
Инструкция по медицинскому применению лекарственного препарата «Скайризи», ЛП-006460 утверждена Минздравом России 14.09.2020 г.
Kristensen L.E., Keiserman M., Papp K. et al. Efficacy and safety of risankizumab for active psoriatic arthritis: 24-week results from the randomised, double-blind, phase 3 KEEPsAKE 1 trial. Ann Rheum Dis 2021;0:1–7.
Östör A., Filip Van den Bosch, Papp K. et al. Efficacy and safety of risankizumab for active psoriatic arthritis: 24-week results from the randomised, double-blind, phase 3 KEEPsAKE 2 trial. Ann Rheum Dis 2021;0:1–8.
Gordon KB, Strober B, Lebwohl M, et al. Effiacy and safety of risankizumab in moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis (UltIMMa-1 and UltIMMa-2): results from two double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled and ustekinumab-controlled phase 3 trials. Lancet. 2018;392:650-661. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31713-6.
Warren, R., Blauvelt, A., Poulin, Y., Beeck, S., Kelly, M., Wu, T., Geng, Z. and Paul, C. (2021). Efficacy and safety of risankizumab vs. secukinumab in patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis (IMMerge): results from a phase III, randomized, open-label, efficacy–assessor-blinded clinical trial*. Br J Dermatol, 184: 50-59. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjd.19341
Gordon K.B., Lebwohl M., Papp K.A. et al. Long-term safety of risankizumab from 17 clinical trials in patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis. British Journal of Dermatology (15 October 2021). https://doi.org/10.1111/bjd.20818
McInnes IB, Anderson JK, Magrey M, et al. Trial of upadacitinib and adalimumab for psoriatic arthritis. N Engl J Med. 2021;384(13):1227-1239. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa2022516
McInnes IB, Kato K, Magrey M, et al. Upadacitinib in patients with psoriatic arthritis and an inadequate response to non-biological therapy: 56-week data from the phase 3 SELECT-PsA 1 study. RMD Open. 2021;7(3):e001838. doi:10.1136/rmdopen-2021-001838
Mease PJ, Lertratanakul A, Anderson JK, et al. Upadacitinib for psoriatic arthritis refractory to biologics: SELECT-PsA 2. Ann Rheum Dis. 2020;80(3):312-320. doi:10.1136/annrheumdis-2020-218870
Mease PJ, Lertratanakul A, Papp KA, et al. Upadacitinib in patients with psoriatic arthritis and inadequate response to biologics: 56-week data from the randomized controlled Phase 3 SELECT-PsA 2 study. Rheumatol Ther. 2021;8(2):903-919. doi:10.1007/s40744-021-00305-z3.
Nash P et al. Upadacitinib as Monotherapy and in Combination with Non-biologic DMARDs for the Treatment of Psoriatic Arthritis: Subgroup Analysis from Two Phase 3 Trials [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2020; 72 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/upadacitinib-as-monotherapy-and-in-combinationwith-non-biologic-dmards-for-the-treatment-of-psoriatic-arthritis-subgroup-analysis-from-two-phase-3-trials/ Доступ 09.09.2021
Deodhar A, et al. Efficacy and Safety of Upadacitinib in Patients with Psoriatic Arthritis and Axial Involvement [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2020; 72 (suppl 10).
Burmester GR, Winthrop K, Blanco R, et al. Safety profile of upadacitinib up to 3 years in patients with psoriatic arthritis: an integrated analysis from the Phase 3 program. [EULAR abstract AB0522]. Ann Rheum Dis. 2021;80(suppl 1):1287-1288.
Deodhar A, Helliwell P, Boehncke WH, et al. Guselkumab in patients with active psoriatic arthritis who were biologic-naive or had previously received TNFα inhibitor treatment (DISCOVER-1): a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2020 Apr 4;395(10230):1115-25. doi: 10.1016/ S0140-6736(20)30265-8. Epub 2020 Mar 13.
Mease PJ, Rahman P, Gottlieb AB, et al. Guselkumab in biologic-naive patients with active psoriatic arthritis (DISCOVER-2): a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2020 Apr 4; 395(10230):1126-1136. doi: 10.1016/S0140- 6736(20)30263-4. Epub 2020 Mar 13.
Coates L, Gossec L, Theander E, et al. Efficacy and safety of guselkumab in patients with active psoriatic arthritis who demonstrated inadequate response to tumor necrosis factor inhibition: Week 24 results of a phase 3b, randomized, controlled study. Ann Rheum Dis. 2021;80(Suppl 1):141.
Reich K, Griffiths ChEM, Gordon KB, et al. Maintenance of clinical response and consistent safety profile with up to 3 years of continuous treatment with guselkumab: results from the VOYAGE 1 and VOYAGE 2 trials. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2020 Apr;82(4): 936-45. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2019.11.040. Epub 2019 Dec 4.