Список литературы

Поставить закладку

Шелыгин Ю.А., Благодарный Л.А. Справочник колопроктолога. М.: Литтера, 2012. С. 64-89.
Воробьев Г.И., Шелыгин Ю.А., Благодарный Л.А. Геморрой. М.: Литтера, 2010. С. 38-40, 114- 116, 137-138, 154-183.
Corman ML. Hemorrhoids. In: Corman ML, eds. Colon and rectal surgery. 6th ed. Philadelphia, USA: Lippincott; 2013:272-366.
Wald A, Bharucha AE, Cosman BC, Whitehead WE. ACG clinical guideline: management of benign anorectal disorders. Am J Gastroenterol. 2014; 109: 1141-1157, (Quiz) 1058.
Bradley RD, et al. The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Management of Hemorrhoids. Dis Colon Rectum. 2018; 61: 284-292.
Международная классификация болезней 10-го пересмотра. МКБ-10. Доступен с: www.10mkb.ru.
Goligher JC. Surgery of the Anus, Rectum and Colon. 1st ed. London, UK: Charles C. Thomas; 1961; 829.
Peery AF, Sandler RS, Galanko JA, et al. Risk factors for hemorrhoids on screening colonoscopy. PLoS One. 2015; 10:e0139100.
Rex DK, Boland CR, Dominitz JA, et al. Colorectal cancer screening: recommendations for physicians and patients from the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer. Am J Gastroenterol. 2017; 112: 1016-1030.
Gralnek IM, Ron-Tal Fisher O, Holub JL, Eisen GM. The role of colonoscopy in evaluating hematochezia: a population-based study in a large consortium of endoscopy practices. Gastrointest Endosc. 2013; 77: 410-418.
Bibbins-Domingo K, Grossman DC, Curry SJ, et al. US Preventive Services Task Force. Screening for colorectal cancer: US Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. JAMA. 2016; 315: 2564-75.
Wexner SD, Baig K. The evaluation and physiologic assessment of hemorrhoidal disease: a review. Tech Coloproctol. 2001;5 (3):165-168.
Lohsiriwat V. Treatment of hemorrhoids: a coloproctologist’s view. World J Gastroenterol: 2015; 21(31): 9245.
Arora G, Mannalithara A, Mithal A, Triadaﬁlopoulos G, Singh G. Concurrent conditions in patients with chronic constipation: a population-based study. PLoS One. 2012; 7:e42910.
Alonso-Coello P, Mills E, Heels-Ansdell D. Laxatives for the treatment of hemorrhoids. Cochrane Database Systematic Reviews. 2005. Issue 4. Art. No.: CD004649.
Johannsson HO, Graf W, Påhlman L. Bowel habits in hemorrhoid patients and normal subjects. Am J Gastroenterol. 2005; 100: 401-6.
Garg P, Singh P. Adequate dietary ﬁber supplement along with TONE concept can help avoid surgery in most patients with advanced hemorrhoids. Minerva Gastroenterol Dietol. 2017; 63: 92-6.
Salvati EP. Nonoperative management of hemorrhoids. Dis Colon Rectum. 1999; 42: 989–93.
Perera N, Liolitsa D, Iype S, Croxford A, Yassin M. Phlebotonics for haemorrhoids. The Cochrane Collaboration. 2012.
Godeberge Ph. Daﬂon 500 mg in the treatment of hemorrhoidal disease: a demonstrated efﬁcacy in comparison with placebo. Angiology. 1994; 45(2): 578-8.
La Torre F, Nicolai AP. Clinical use of micronized puriﬁed ﬂavonoid fraction for treatment of symptoms after hemorrhoidectomy: results of a randomized, controlled, clinical trial. Dis Colon Rectum. 2004; 47: 704–710.
Alonso-Coello, P, et al., Meta-analysis of ﬂavonoids for the treatment of haemorrhoids. Br J Surg, 2006. 93(8): 909-20.
Jongen J, Bach S, Stubinger SH, Bock J.U. Excision of thrombosed external hemorrhoid under local anesthesia: a retrospective evaluation of 340 patients. Dis Colon Rectum. 2003; 46: 1226– 31.
Люлльман Х., Мор К., Хайн Л. Фармакология: атлас. - М.: Практическая медицина. 2016; 384.
Altomare DF, Picciariello A, Pecorella G, Milito G, Naldini G, Amato A, Ratto C, Perinotti R. Surgical management of haemorrhoids: an Italian survey of over 32 000 patients over 17 years. Colorectal Disease. 2018; 20(12): 1117-1124.
Albuquerque A. Rubber band ligation of hemorrhoids: a guide for complications. World J Gastrointest Surg. 2016; 8(9): 614–620.
Sim HL, et al., Life-threatening perineal sepsis after rubber band ligation of haemorrhoids. Tech Coloproctol. 2009: 13(2); 161-4.
McCloud JM, Jameson JS, Scott AN. Life-threatening sepsis following treatment for haemorrhoids: a systematic review. Colorectal Dis. 2006; 8(9): 748-55.
Tejirian T, Abbas MA. Bacterial endocarditis following rubber band ligation in a patient with a ventricular septal defect: report of a case and guideline analysis. Dis Colon Rectum. 2006; 49(12): 1931-3.
Chau NG, Bhatia S, Raman M. Pylephlebitis and pyogenic liver abscesses: a complication of hemorrhoidal banding. Can J Gastroenterol. 2007; 21(9): 601-3.
Andrews E. The treatment of hemorrhoids by injection. Med Rec. 1879; 15: 451.
Костарев И.В., Благодарный Л.А., Фролов С.А. Результаты склерозирующего лечения геморроя у больных с высоким хирургическим риском. Российский журнал гастроэнтерологии, гепатологии, колопроктологии. 2010; 20(1): 82-87.
Фролов С.А., Благодарный Л.А., Костарев И.В. Склеротерапия детергентами – метод выбора лечения больных кровоточащим геморроем, осложненным анемией. Колопроктология. 2011; 2(36): 23-27.
Kanellos I, Goulimaris I, Christoforidis E, Kelpis T, Betsis D. A Comparison of the simultaneous application of sclerotherapy and rubber band ligation, with sclerotherapy and rubber band ligation applied separately, for the treatment of haemorrhoids: a prospective randomized trial. Colorect Disease. 2003; 5: 133–8.
Leicester RJ, Nicholls RJ, Mann CV. Comparison of infrared coagulation with conventional methods and the treatment of hemorrhoids. Coloproctology. 1981; 5: 313.
Leicester RJ, Nicholls RJ, Mann CV. Infrared coagulation: a new treatment for hemorrhoids. Dis Colon Rectum. 1981; 24: 602.
Ricci MP, Matos D, Saad SS. Rubber band ligation and infrared photocoagulation for the outpatient treatment of hemorrhoidal disease. Acta Cir Bras. 2008; 23(1): 102-6.
Marques CF, et al. Early results of the treatment of internal hemorrhoid disease by infrared coagulation and elastic banding: a prospective randomized cross-over trial. Tech Coloproctol. 2006; 10(4): 312-7.
Poen AC, et al. A randomized controlled trial of rubber band ligation versus infrared coagulation in the treatment of internal haemorrhoids. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2000; 12(5): 535-9. 23
Peng BC, Jayne DG, Ho Y.H. Randomized trial of rubber band ligation vs. stapled hemorrhoidectomy for prolapsed piles. Dis Colon Rectum. 2003; 46: 291–97.
Brown SR, Watson A. Comments to ‘rubber band ligation versus excisional haemorrhoidectomy for haemorrhoids’. Tech Coloproctol. 2016; 20(9): 1–3.
Brown S, Tiernan J, Biggs K et al. The HubBLe Trial: haemorrhoidal artery ligation (HAL) versus rubber band ligation (RBL) for symptomatic second‐ and third‐degree haemorrhoids: a multicentre randomised controlled trial and health‐economic evaluation. Health Technol Assess. 2016; 20: 1–150.
Alshreef A, et al. Cost-Effectiveness of Haemorrhoidal Artery Ligation versus Rubber Band Ligation for the Treatment of Grade II-III Haemorrhoids: Analysis Using Evidence from the HubBLe Trial. Pharmacoecon Open. 2017; 1(3): 175-84.
Sajid MS, et al. A systematic review comparing transanal haemorrhoidal dearterialisation to stapled haemorrhoidopexy in the management of haemorrhoidal disease. Tech Coloproctol. 2012; 16(1): 1-8.
Gupta PJ, et al. Doppler-guided hemorrhoidal artery ligation does not offer any advantage over suture ligation of grade 3 symptomatic hemorrhoids. Tech Coloproctol. 2011; 15(4): 439-44.
Pucher PH, et al. Clinical outcome following Doppler-guided haemorrhoidal artery ligation: a systematic review. Colorectal Dis. 2013; 15(6): e284-94.
Tsunoda A, et al., Comparison of the early results of transanal hemorrhoidal dearterialization and hemorrhoidectomy using an ultrasonic scalpel. Surg Today. 2015; 45(2): 175-80.
Giordano P, et al. Prospective evaluation of stapled haemorrhoidopexy versus transanal haemorrhoidal dearterialisation for stage II and III haemorrhoids: threeyear outcomes. Tech Coloproctol. 2011; 15(1): 67-73.
Infantino A, et al. Prospective randomized multicentre study comparing stapler haemorrhoidopexy with Doppler-guided transanal haemorrhoid dearterialization for third- degree haemorrhoids. Colorectal Dis. 2012; 14(2): 205-11.
Ratto C, Donisi L, Parello A, Litta F, Zaccone G, De Simone V. Distal Doppler-guided dearterialization’ is highly effective in treating haemorrhoids by transanal haemorrhoidal dearterialization. Colorectal Disease. 2012; 14: 786-789.
Ratto C, Donisi L, Parello A, Litta F, Doglietto GB. Evaluation of transanal hemorrhoidal dearterialization as aminimally invasive therapeutic approach to hemorrhoids. Dis Colon Rectum. 2010; 53: 803–11.
Zampieri N, Castellani R, Andreoli R, Geccherle A. Long-term results and quality of life in patients treated with hemorrhoidectomy using two different techniques: Ligasure versus transanal hemorrhoidal dearterialization. The American Journal of Surgery. 2012; 204, 684 – 688.
Lienert M, Ulrich B. Doppler-guided ligation of the hemorrhoidal arteries. Report of experiences with 248 patients. Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 2004; 129: 947–50.
Lehur PA, et al. Cost-effectiveness of New Surgical Treatments for Hemorrhoidal Disease: A Multicentre Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Transanal Dopplerguided Hemorrhoidal Artery Ligation With Mucopexy and Circular Stapled Hemorrhoidopexy. Ann Surg. 2016; 264(5): 710-6.
Aigner F, et al. Doppler-guided haemorrhoidal artery ligation with suture mucopexy compared with suture mucopexy alone for the treatment of Grade III haemorrhoids: a prospective randomized controlled trial. Colorectal Dis. 2016; 18(7): 710-6.
Denoya P, Tam J, Bergamaschi R. Hemorrhoidal dearterialization with mucopexy versus hemorrhoidectomy: 3-year follow-up assessment of a randomized controlled trial. Tech Coloproctol. 2014; 18(11): 1081-5.
Xu L, et al. Transanal hemorrhoidal dearterialization with mucopexy versus open hemorrhoidectomy in the treatment of hemorrhoids: a meta-analysis of randomized control trials. Tech Coloproctol. 2016; 20(12): 825-33.
Титов А.Ю., Абрицова М.В., Мудров А.А. Допплероконтролируемая дезартеризация с мукопексией и геморроидэктомия в лечении геморроя. Хирургия. Журнал им. Н.И. Пирогова. 2016; 2: 24-32.
Faes S, Pratsinis M, et al. Short‐ and long‐term outcomes of laser haemorrhoidoplasty for grade II–III haemorrhoidal disease. Colorectal Disease. 2019; 21(6): 689-96.
Naderan M, et al. A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Laser IntraHemorrhoidal Coagulation and Milligan-Morgan Hemorrhoidectomy. J Invest Surg. 2017; 30(5): 325-31.
Ravo B, Amato A, Bianco V, et al. Complications after stapled hemorrhoidectomy: can they be prevented? Tech Coloproctol. 2002; 6: 83–8.
Bellio G, Pasquali A, Schiano di Visconte M. Stapled haemorrhoidopexy: results at 10‐year follow‐up. Dis Colon Rectum. 2018; 61: 491– 8.
Lumb KJ, Colquhoun PH, Malthaner R, Jayaraman S. Stapled versus conventional surgery for hemorrhoids. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2006, Issue 4. Art. No.: CD005393. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.
Kilonzo MM, et al. Cost Effectiveness of Stapled Haemorrhoidopexy and Traditional Excisional Surgery for the Treatment of Haemorrhoidal Disease. Pharmacoecon Open. 2018; 2(3): 271-280.
Watson AJ, Cook J, Hudson J et al. A pragmatic multicentre randomised controlled trial comparing stapled haemorrhoidopexy with traditional excisional surgery for haemorrhoidal disease: the eTHoS study. Health Technol Assess. 2017; 21: 1–224.
Mehigan BJ., Monson JR., Hartley JE. Stapling procedure for haemorrhoids versus Milligan- Morgan haemorrhoidectomy: randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2001; 355: 782–85.
Pope V, Doran H, Fearn S, Brough W, Wilson M. Randomized, controlled trial comparing quality of life after open hemorrhoidectomy (OH) plus stapled anopexy (SA). Dis Colon Rectum; 2001; 44: 8.
Shalaby R, Desoky A. Randomized clinical trial of stapled versus Milligan-Morgan haemorrhoidectomy. Br J Surg. 2001; 88: 1049–53.
Ganio E, Altomare DF, Gabrielli F, Millito G, Canuti S. Prospective randomized multicentre trial comparing stapled with open haemorrhoidectomy. Br J Surg. 2001; 88: 669–74.
Oughriss M, Yver R, Faucheron JL. Complications of stapled hemorrhoidectomy: a French multicentric study. Gastroenterol Clin Biol. 2005; 29: 429–33.
Molloy Rg, Kingsmore D. Life-threatening pelvis sepsis after stapled haemorrhoidectomy. Lancet. 2000; 355: 782–5.
Pescatori M, Gagliardi G. Postoperative complications after procedure for prolapsed hemorrhoids (PPH) and stapled transanal rectal resection (STARR) procedures. Tech Coloproctol. 2008; 12: 7–19.
Wong L-Y, Jiang J-K, Chang S-C, et al. Rectal perforation: a life-threatening complication of stapled hemorrhoidectomy: report of a case. Dis Colon Rectum. 2003; 46: 116-117.
Pessaux P, Tuech JJ., Laurent B, et al. Morbidity after stapled haemorrhoidectomy: long-term results about 140 patients and review of the literature. Ann Chir. 2004; 129: 571–7.
Cheetham MJ, Mortensen NJM, Nystrom P-O, et al. Persistent pain and fecal urgency after stapled haemoffhoidectomy. Lancet. 2000; 356: 730.
Simillis C, et al. Systematic review and network meta-analysis comparing clinical outcomes and effectiveness of surgical treatments for haemorrhoids. Br J Surg. 2015; 102(13): 1603-18.
Arbman G, Krook H, Haapaniemi S. Closed vs. Open hemorrhoidectomy—is there any difference? Dis Colon Rectum. 2000; 43: 31–4.
Bhatti MI, Sajid MS, Baig MK. Milligan-Morgan (Open) Versus Ferguson Haemorrhoidectomy (Closed): A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Published Randomized, Controlled Trials. World J Surg. 2016; 40(6): 1509-19.
Chung Y-C, Wu H-J. Clinical experience of sutureless closed hemorrhoidectomy with Ligasure. Dis Colon Rectum. 2003; 46: 87-92.
Tan JJ., Seow-Choen F. Prospective, randomized trial comparing diathermy and harmonic scalpel hemorrhoidectomy. Dis Colon Rectum. 2001; 44: 677–9.
Xu L, et al. Ligasure versus Ferguson hemorrhoidectomy in the treatment of hemorrhoids: a meta-analysis of randomized control trials. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2015; 25(2): 106-10.
Khan S, Pawlak SE, Eggenberger JC, et al. Surgical treatment of hemorrhoids: prospective, randomized trial comparing closed excisional hemorrhoidectomy and the harmonic scalpel technique of excisional hemorrhoidectomy. Dis Colon Rectum. 2001; 44: 845–9.
Хмылов Л.М., Титов А.Ю., Капуллер Л.Л., Максимова Л.В., Шахматов Д.Г. Сравнительная характеристика течения раневого процесса и послеоперационного периода у больных перенесших геморроидэктомию ультразвуковым скальпелем и традиционными способами. Колопроктология. 2004; 2(8): 14-20.
Mushaya CD, et al. Harmonic scalpel compared with conventional excisional haemorrhoidectomy: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Tech Coloproctol. 2014; 18(11): 1009-16.
Chung CC, Ha JP, Tai YP, Tsang WW, Li MK. Double-blind, randomized trial comparing harmonic scalpel hemorrhoidectomy, bipolar scissors hemorrhoidectomy, and scissors excision: ligation technique. Dis Colon Rectum. 2002; 45: 789–94.
Armstrong DN, Frankum C, Schertzer ME, Ambroze WL, Orangio GR. Harmonic scalpel hemorrhoidectomy: ﬁve hundred consecutive cases. Dis Colon Rectum. 2002; 45: 354–9.
Nienhuijs SW, de Hingh IHJT. Conventional versus LigaSure hemorrhoidectomy for patients with symptomatic Hemorrhoids. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2009; Issue 1. Art. No.: CD006761. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.
Franklin EJ, Seetharam S, Lowney J, et al. Randomized, clinical trial of Ligasure vs. conventional diathermy in hemorrhoidectomy. Dis Colon Rectum. 2003; 46: 1380.
Благодарный Л.А., Шелыгин Ю.А., Хмылов Л.А., Соттаева В.Х. Бесшовная геморроидэктомия. Колопроктология. 2006; 3(17): 8-12.