1. Hofmeyr G.J. Overview of breech presentation. Literature review current through: Feb 2020 | This topic last updated: Dec 16, 2019. https://www.uptodate.com/contents/overview-of.breech-presentation.
2. Sekulić S., Ilinčić M., Radeka G., Novakov-Mikic A., Simić S., Podgorac J., et al. Breech presentation and the cornual-fundal location of the placenta. Croat Med J. 2013; 54(2):198-202.
3. Mostello D., Chang J.J., Bai F., Wang J., Guild C., Stamps K., et al. Breech presentation at delivery: a marker for congenital anomaly? J Perinatol. 2014; 34(l):ll-5.
4. Fruscalzo A., Londero A.P., Salvador S., Bertozzi S., Biasioli A., Delia Martina M., et al. New and old predictive factors for breech presentation: our experience in 14 433 singleton pregnancies and a literature review. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2014; 27(2):167-72.
5. Акушерство: национальное руководство I под ред. Г. Μ. Савельевой, Г. Т. Сухих, В. H. Серова, В. E. Paдзинcкoгo. - 2-е изд., пepepaб. и доп. M.: ΓЭOTAP-Meдиa; 2018. 1088 р.
6. Management of Breech Presentation: Green-top Guideline No. 20b. BJOG. 2017; 124(7):el51-77.
7. Breech Presentation, External Cephalic Version (ECV) and Breech Presentation in Labour Clinical Guideline V2.1. 2019. 13 p.
8. Department for Health and Ageing, Government of South Australia. Breech Presentation. South Australian Perinatal Practice Guideline. -2018.-13 p.
9. Kotaska A., Menticoglou S. No. 384-Management of Breech Presentation at Term. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2019; 41(8):1193-205.
10. Breech Presentation and Delivery. SOGC Obstetrical Content Review committee, 2012.
11. Hofmeyr GJ. Abnormal fetal presentation and position. In: Chapter 34, Turnbulľs Obstetrics, 2000.
12. Hofmeyr G.J. Delivery of the singleton fetus in breech presentation. Literature review current through: Feb 2020. | This topic last updated: Feb 24, 2020. https://www.uptodate.com/contents/delivery-of-the-singIeton-fetus-in-breech-presentation.
13. J. Payne. Breech Presentations / EMIS Group pic UK. - 2016.
14. Guidelines For The Management of Breech Presentation Including External Cephalic Version (ECV). NHS; 2014.23 p.
15. External Cephalic Version and Reducing the Incidence of Term Breech Presentation: Green-top Guideline No. 20a. BJOG. 2017; 124(7):el78-92.
16. Gynaecology. K.E.M.H.O.&. Clinical practice guideline: Abnormalities of Lie / Presentation. 2018. 24 p.
17. Hofmeyr G.J., Kulier R., West H.M. External cephalic version for breech presentation at term. Cochrane database Syst Rev. 2015; (4):CD000083.
18. Hutton E.K., Hannah M.E., Ross S.J., Delisle M.-F., Carson G.D., Windrim R., et al. The Early External Cephalic Version (ECV) 2 Trial: an international multicentre randomised controlled trial of timing of ECV for breech pregnancies. BJOG. 2011; 118(5):564-77.
19. Hutton E.K., Hofmeyr G.J., Dowswell T. External cephalic version for breech presentation before term. Cochrane database Syst Rev. 2015; (7):CD000084.
20. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists' Committee on Practice Bulletins-Obstetrics. Practice Bulletin No. 161: External Cephalic Version. Obstet Gynecol. 2016; 127(2):e54-61.
21. ACOG Committee Opinion No. 745: Mode ofTerm Singleton Breech Delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 2018; 132(2):e60-3.
22. Thissen D., Swinkels P., Dullemond R.C., van der Steeg J.W. Introduction of a dedicated team increases the success rate of external cephalic version: A prospective cohort study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2019; 236:193-7.
23. Goffínet F., Carayol M., Foidart J.-M., Alexander S., Uzan S., Subtil D., et al. Is planned vaginal delivery for breech presentation at term still an option? Results of an observational prospective survey in France and Belgium. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006; 194(4):1002-11.
24. Azria E., Le Meaux J.-P., Khoshnood B., Alexander S., Subtil D., Goffınet F., et al. Factors associated with adverse perinatal outcomes for term breech fetuses with planned vaginal delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2012; 207(4):285.el-9.
25. Glezerman M. Five years to the term breech trial: the rise and fall of a randomized controlled trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006; 194(1):20-5.
26. Menticoglou S.M. Why vaginal breech delivery should still be offered. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2006; 28(5):380-5; discussion 386-9.
27. Whyte H., Hannah M.E., Saigal S., Hannah W.J., Hewson S., Amankwah K., et al. Outcomes of children at 2 years after planned cesarean birth versus planned vaginal birth for breech presentation at term: the International Randomized Term Breech Trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004; 191(3):864-71.
28. Negele K., Heinrich J., Borte M., von Berg A., Schaaf В., Lehmann I., et al. Mode of delivery and development of atopic disease during the first 2 years of life. Pediatr Allergy Immunol. 2004; 15(l):48-54.
29. Laubereau B., Filipiak-Pittroff B., von Berg A., Grübl A., Reinhardt D., Wichmann H.E., et al. Caesarean section and gastrointestinal symptoms, atopic dermatitis, and sensitisation during the first year of life. Arch Dis Child. 2004; 89(11):993-7.
30. Hull A.D., Moore T.R. Multiple repeat cesareans and the threat of placenta accreta: incidence, diagnosis, management. Clin Perinatol. 2011; 38(2):285-96.
31. Schutte J.M., Steegers E.A.P., Santema J.G., Schuitemaker N.W.E., van Roosmalen J., Maternal Mortality Committee Of The Netherlands Society Of Obstetrics. Maternal deaths after elective cesarean section for breech presentation in the Netherlands. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2007; 86(2):240-3.
32. Lawson G.W. Report of a breech cesarean section maternal death. Birth. 2011; 38(2):159-61.
33. Ismail M.A., Nagib N., Ismail Т., Cibils L.A. Comparison of vaginal and cesarean section delivery for fetuses in breech presentation. J Perinat Med. 1999; 27(5):339-51.
34. Bergenhenegouwen L., VIemmix F., Ensing S., Schaaf J., van der Post J., Abu-Hanna A., et al. Preterm Breech Presentation: A Comparison of Intended Vaginal and Intended Cesarean Delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 2015; 126(6):1223-30.